|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]李明,王丰彩.福建省青少年体操锦标赛E裁评分客观性分析——以2021年男子体操单项决赛为例[J].体育科学研究,2022,26(5):52-56.
 LI Ming,WANG Feng-cai.Objective Analysis of Referees’Scoring in Group E of Fujian Provincial Youth Gymnastic Championship——Case Study on the Men’s Individual Gymnastics Final in 2021[J].sports science research,2022,26(5):52-56.
点击复制

福建省青少年体操锦标赛E裁评分客观性分析——以2021年男子体操单项决赛为例(PDF)
分享到:

《体育科学研究》[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
26
期数:
2022年5期
页码:
52-56
栏目:
运动竞赛与训练学
出版日期:
2022-11-18

文章信息/Info

Title:
Objective Analysis of Referees’Scoring in Group E of Fujian Provincial Youth Gymnastic Championship——Case Study on the Men’s Individual Gymnastics Final in 2021
作者:
李明王丰彩
(集美大学诚毅学院,福建 厦门 361021)
Author(s):
LI MingWANG Feng-cai
(Chengyi College,Jimei University,Xiamen 361021,China)
关键词:
青少年锦标赛体操比赛裁判员评分客观性
Keywords:
Youth Championship gymnastics competition judge’s score objectivity
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
研究通过对2021年福建省青少年体操锦标赛男子单项决赛E组裁判评分数据进行客观性分析,探讨了福建省体操裁判评分的准确度和客观性,并提出相关建议,旨在提高福建裁判团队的执裁水平。结果表明:三个组别6个单项决赛项目的E组裁判员评分的客观性系数除了丁组的吊环和自由体操两个项目的一致性系数稍低外,其他项目的评分一致性系数都比较高,裁判员评分的随机误差情况整体上控制较好;三个组别6个项目的评分差异不显著,裁判员评分的标准比较一致;个别裁判员极差值和无效分的出现机率稍大,但对运动员最后得分的可信度影响不大。建议:提高福建体操裁判执裁评分标准的准确度和一致性,合理控制和处理评分误差,降低无效分的出现机率,确保男子体操裁判评分的客观性,完善体操裁判评价机制。
Abstract:
In ways of literature review, field observation and mathematical statistics, the objective analysis of the scoring data of Group E judges of the men’s single event final of the 2021 Fujian Provincial Youth Gymnastics Championship, this paper investigated and analyzed the accuracy and objectivity of the scoring of gymnastics judges in Fujian Province, then put forward relevant suggestions to improve the adjudication level of Fujian referees.The preliminary findings are as follows: the objectivity coefficient of the judges’ scores in group E of the six individual final events of the three groups is relatively high, except for the consistency coefficient of the rings and floor exercise of group D, which is slightly lower. The random error of the judges’ scores is well controlled on the whole. There was no significant difference in the scores of the 6 items in the three groups, and the judges’ scoring standards were consistent. The probability of range and invalid score of individual judges is slightly larger, but it has little influence on the credibility of the final score of athletes. Therefore, to ensure the objectivity of the scoring of men’s gymnastics judges and improve the evaluation mechanism of gymnastics judges, we should improve the accuracy and consistency of the scoring standards of Fujian gymnastics judges, reasonably control and deal with the scoring errors, reduce the probability of invalid scores.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-11-18