刑事“难办”案件处理程序的反思及完善-《集美大学学报》（哲社版）

文章信息/Info

Title:: Reflection from and Perfection of Handling the Procedure of Criminal “Difficult” Cases

Author(s):: CHEN Guizhu; （College of Law,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China）

摘要:: 刑事诉讼法律规范中存在大量重大、疑难、复杂案件的条款，并规定了不同于一般案件的处理程序，这类案件为刑事“难办”案件。刑事“难办”案件处理程序规定具有贯穿全流程且差异化显著、由专门机关掌控程序适用、职权的集体化行使、通过机关内部权力实现制约监督以及“难办”要素集中于审判监督程序等特点。刑事“难办”案件范围过于模糊致使强制性规则变为“软效力”的裁量性规则。此外，刑事“难办”案件处理程序还存在缺乏对当事人的权利保障、仅靠内部制约难以有效实现职权规制等问题。因此，应当通过健全刑事“难办”案件适用范围规则、强化对当事人的程序权利保障以及准诉讼化、实质性审查等外部审查制约机制等方面对刑事“难办”案件的处理程序予以完善。

Abstract:: There are a large number of clauses in the legal norms of criminal procedure for major/difficult/complex cases,which stipulate procedures different from ordinary cases.These are generally referred to as “difficult” criminal cases.The procedures for handling “difficult” cases have the characteristics of running through the whole process and distinct differences,the application of procedures controlled by specialized agencies,the collective exercise of power,the restriction and supervision realized through the internal power of agencies,and the “difficult” elements concentrated on the trial supervision procedures.The scope of “difficult” cases is so vague that mandatory rules become discretionary rules with “soft effect”.In addition,there are still some problems in the process,such as lack of protection of the rights of the parties,difficulty in effectively regulating functions and powers only by internal restriction.To handle the procedure of “difficult” cases involves improving the rules of the scope of application of “difficult” cases,and strengthening the protection of procedural rights of the parties,and the external review restriction mechanisms such as quasi-litigation and substantive review.