|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]代中强.知识产权调查引致的贸易壁垒:一个统计分析[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016,19(01):30-40.
 Trade Barrier Caused by Intellectual Property Investigation: A Statistical Analysis.Trade Barrier Caused by Intellectual Property Investigation: A Statistical Analysis[J].philosophy&social sciences,2016,19(01):30-40.
点击复制

知识产权调查引致的贸易壁垒:一个统计分析()
分享到:

《集美大学学报》(哲学社会科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
19
期数:
2016年01期
页码:
30-40
栏目:
出版日期:
2016-01-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Trade Barrier Caused by Intellectual Property Investigation: A Statistical Analysis
作者:
代中强12
(1.集美大学 区域经济研究中心,福建 厦门 361021;2.集美大学 财经学院,福建 厦门 361021)
Author(s):
Trade Barrier Caused by Intellectual Property Investigation: A Statistical Analysis
(1.Research Centre for Regional Economy, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China; 2.College of Finance and Economics, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China)
关键词:
知识产权337调查贸易壁垒
Keywords:
intellectual property 337 Investigation trade barrier
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
近年来,由于信息不对称和诉讼双方地位不对等,打着维护公平贸易旗号的知识产权调查已经异化为一种新型的贸易壁垒。利用美国国际贸易委员会337调查数据库,从案件总量、涉案来源地、调查类型、涉案产业、判决结果五个方面对知识产权调查做一个全面考察。发现:调查主要集中在机电产品的专利侵权方面;调查的主要来源地是中国大陆、中国台湾和日本;较高的和解和同意令比例意味着原告发起知识产权诉讼很可能是希望起到贸易威慑或被动和解的“敲竹杠”效应。
Abstract:
In recent years, due to the asymmetric information and the status of the two parties, the intellectual property investigation under the banner of maintaining fair trade has become a new type of trade barrier. We use 337 survey database of USITC to do a comprehensive study in such aspects as the total number of cases, the respondent area of origin, the type of investigation, the industry involved, and the settlement of cases. Statistics show that the investigations were mainly concentrated on the patent infringement of mechanical and electrical products, and that the main respondent areas of origin were China mainland, Taiwan and Japan. Furthermore, higher percentage of settlement and consent order means that the plaintiff is likely to obtain a trade deterrent or a “rip-off” effect.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]徐全红.美国对华337调查的发展趋势[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2015,18(02):74.
 XU Quan-hong.On the Development Trend of the American 337 Investigation on China[J].philosophy&social sciences,2015,18(01):74.
[2]代中强.知识产权名义保护、实际保护与发展中国家福利——以南京市江宁区为例[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,17(02):58.
 DAI Zhong -qiang.Nominal Intellectual Property Protection, Real Protection and Welfare of Developing Countries[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(01):58.
[3]庄智博.商标合理使用:对商标权限制的误读——以武夷山、湄洲岛为例[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,17(03):98.
 ZHUANG Zhi -bo.Trademark Fair Use: A Misreading of Trademark Rights Restrictions[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(01):98.
[4]朱一青.跨境交易模式下司法反避税研究——基于知识产权法视角的路径分析[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,23(04):86.
 ZHU Yi-qing.Judicial Anti-avoidance Solutions:A Perspective of Intellectual Property Law under Cross-border Trading Model[J].philosophy&social sciences,2020,23(01):86.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-03-04