|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]黄文虎.跨文化视野下《金瓶梅》的“文本身份”[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2017,20(01):92-98.
　HUANG Wen-hu.The Textual Identity of Jin Ping Mei in the Intercultural Perspective[J].philosophy&social sciences,2017,20(01):92-98.
点击复制

跨文化视野下《金瓶梅》的“文本身份”()
分享到：

《集美大学学报》（哲社版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
20
期数:
2017年01期
页码:
92-98
栏目:
出版日期:
2017-01-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Textual Identity of Jin Ping Mei in the Intercultural Perspective
作者:
黄文虎
（华侨大学文学院，福建 泉州 362021）
Author(s):
HUANG Wen-hu
(College of Humanities, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, China)
关键词:
《金瓶梅》; 文本身份; 虚构性; 写实性
Keywords:
Jin Ping Mei;  textual identity;  fictionality;  reality
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
《金瓶梅》的“文本身份”存在争议，不正视这一问题，就无法准确把握这本奇书的整体创作风格。20世纪以来，中国学界的主流观点受到“史传书写”观的影响，倾向于将《金瓶梅》视为一部现实主义小说，而往往忽略了作品中“非写实”的一面。与此相对，美国学界则受到“形式主义”的影响，将《金瓶梅》视为一个独立的艺术审美对象，注重挖掘其“虚构性”特质。以海外汉学为参照对象，对中美学界代表性观点进行对比，有助于从一种更为全面、开放的国际化视角来审视这部奇书中写实与虚构之间的关系。
Abstract:
The textual identity of Jin Ping Mei has been a debated issue for a long time. If this problem is ignored, we will fail to grasp the complicated style of this book. From the 20th century, Jin Ping Mei has been seen as a realistic novel in Chinese academic circles. However, the non-realistic side of this book has been neglected. On the contrary, the fictionality of this book has been explored by American academic circles from the narratology perspective. According to the comparison with the typical opinions of Chinese-American academic circles, it is helpful to survey the relationships between reality and fictionality about this book in a more comprehensive and international perspective.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]姜家君,傅小凡.《金瓶梅》中的身体叙事与女性生存困境——纽约派诗人肯尼斯·科克评介[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2014,17(02):92.
　JIANG Jia-jun,FU Xiao-fan.Body Narrative and Female’s Survival Plight in Jin Ping Mei[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(01):92.
[2]黄文虎.武松形象的跨文化阐释——以美国华裔学者《金瓶梅》研究视野为背景[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2017,20(03):58.
　HUANG Wen-hu.The Intercultural Interpretation of Wu Song＇s Image From the Perspective of Ethnic Chinese Scholars in America[J].philosophy&social sciences,2017,20(01):58.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-03-09