|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]张结根.冲突话语研究四十年[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,23(02):123-128.
 ZHANG Jie-gen.A Review of Conflict Talk Research[J].philosophy&social sciences,2020,23(02):123-128.
点击复制

冲突话语研究四十年(PDF)
分享到:

《集美大学学报》(哲学社会科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
23
期数:
2020年02
页码:
123-128
栏目:
出版日期:
2020-04-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Review of Conflict Talk Research
作者:
张结根
(合肥工业大学外国语学院,安徽 合肥 230601)
Author(s):
ZHANG Jie-gen
(School of Foreign Studies,Hefei University of Technology,Hefei 230601,China)
关键词:
冲突话语话语分析理性主体间性
Keywords:
conflict talkdiscourse analysisrationalityintersubjectivity
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
研究冲突话语可以从侧面揭示话语对人际关系的建构意义,为人际和谐和社会和谐提供启示。现有相关研究主要从表现形式、产生原因、制约因素、语用功能、管理策略等方面展开,丰富了人们对冲突话语各个方面的认识,对人际关系的和谐管理和社会的和谐发展具有参考价值。然而现有研究总体上侧重语言形式和策略的分析,忽视了话语主体的理性在冲突话语中的作用;在重视冲突话语中语言意义和社会意义的理解的同时,对主体间基于理性的沟通与磋商没有给予足够的重视。
Abstract:
The research on conflict talk can reveal indirectly the constructive potential of discourse for interpersonal relationship,and provide implications for interpersonal and social harmony.Related researches have focused on the forms,triggers,constraints,pragmatic functions and managerial strategies of conflict talk.The researches have enriched the knowledge of conflict talk and offered valuable reference for rapport management and harmonious social development.However,they have neglected the role of discourse subjects’ rationality while concentrating on linguistic forms and strategies,and paid insufficient attention to the rationality-based intersubjective communication and negotiation while emphasizing the understanding of linguistic and social implications.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]许淑瑶.违反合作原则的夫妻冲突话语的语言策略描述——以《绝望主妇》为语料[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,22(01):123.
 XU Shu-yao.Descriptive Statistics of Language Strategy in the Violation of the Cooperative Principle in the Conflict Talk between Couples——A Case Study on Desperate Housewives[J].philosophy&social sciences,2019,22(02):123.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-05-21