|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]林坤.司法公开的三大实践隐忧[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,23(02):89-97.
 LIN Kun.Calmness behind the Noise:Three Major Practical Concerns about Judicial Transparency[J].philosophy&social sciences,2020,23(02):89-97.
点击复制

司法公开的三大实践隐忧(PDF)
分享到:

《集美大学学报》(哲学社会科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
23
期数:
2020年02
页码:
89-97
栏目:
出版日期:
2020-04-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Calmness behind the Noise:Three Major Practical Concerns about Judicial Transparency
作者:
林坤
(福建江夏学院法学院,福建 福州 350108)
Author(s):
LIN Kun
(Law of School,Fujian Jiangxia University,Fuzhou 350108,China)
关键词:
司法公开错误思维实践隐忧
Keywords:
judicial transparencyerroneous thinkingpractical concerns
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
由于部分司法公开实践者在认知形态和价值衡量上的错误思维,当前司法公开工作呈现出知性“茫然”造成的感性“热闹”下的理性“偏失”样态,依然存在规范文件与司法现状的不适、制度设计与用户需求的差异以及运行效果与司法实践的失调等三大方面的隐忧。
Abstract:
Due to the erroneous thinking of some judicial transparency practitioners in cognitive form and value measurement,the current judicial transparency work presents a rational “deviation” under the emotional “noise” caused by intellectual “loss”.There are three major concerns:inconsistence between regulatory documents and the status quo of the judiciary,differences in system design and user needs,and misalignment between operational effects and judicial practice.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-05-21