|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]程水龙.论东亚对叶采《近思录集解》的推崇与质疑[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,23(03):15-22.
 CHENG Shui-long.East Asia’s Admiration for and Questioning of Ye Cai’s Jin Si Lu Ji Jie[J].philosophy&social sciences,2020,23(03):15-22.
点击复制

论东亚对叶采《近思录集解》的推崇与质疑(PDF)
分享到:

《集美大学学报》(哲学社会科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
23
期数:
2020年03
页码:
15-22
栏目:
出版日期:
2020-08-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
East Asia’s Admiration for and Questioning of Ye Cai’s Jin Si Lu Ji Jie
作者:
程水龙
(苏州大学 文学院,江苏 苏州 215123)
Author(s):
CHENG Shui-long
(College of Chinese Language and Literature,Suzhou University,Suzhou 215123,China)
关键词:
《近思录集解》朱子学朝鲜半岛日本
Keywords:
Si Lu Ji JieZhu Xi’s philosophyKorean PeninsulaJapan
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
朱熹、吕祖谦共编的《近思录》在后世“被经典”。叶采为朱熹再传弟子,其《近思录集解》在中国本土宗朱的社会背景下颇受推崇,得到《近思录》绝大多数注者读者的赞赏,其传本之多、种类之繁,几乎替代《近思录》原书而行传播程朱理学思想之实。朝鲜半岛、日本学者面对《近思录集解》或赞赏之,或探讨其不足,明确地质疑,两国学者间同中又有异。朝鲜学者或增删、或辨疑、或校订,其民族的主体意识由面对宗主的自卑走向自尊。日本学者则不盲从,敢于批判,将中土文献为己所用,解说时增附己见,流露出一种民族自信意识。在朝、日社会发展中后期,朝鲜朱子学思想逐渐成熟,日本学者已渐失严格固守中国本土尊崇《近思录集解》的心态。
Abstract:
The bookJin Si Lu, compiled by Zhu Xi and Lu Zuqian,was later considered as a classic.Ye Cai was a disciple of Zhu Xi’s disciple,and his work Jin Si Lu JiJie was highly commended under the social background of China where Zhu Xi was worshipped.The number of Si Lu Ji Jie and its editions were so big that it almost replaced Jin Si Lu in spreading the thought of Neo-Confucianism.However,Korean Peninsula and Japanese scholars were different in their attitude towards Si Lu Ji Jie.Korean scholars made some additions and deletions,or edited this book,which reflected their national consciousness from inferiority to self-esteem.Japanese scholars,in contrast,did not follow blindly,but dared to criticize,using the book for their good and adding to it their own opinions,which showed their consciousness of national confidence.In the later period of social development,Zhu Xi’s philosophy was well acknowledged on Korean Peninsula,while Japan gradually lost its admiration for Si Lu Ji Jie.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]翟奎凤.黄道周与宋明理学及朱子学[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,17(03):71.
 ZHAI Kui-feng.Huang Daozhou and Song Ming Neo-Confucianism and Zhuism[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(03):71.
[2]钟治国.朱子学与阳明学之关系考论——以钟芳与王阳明的思想交涉为例[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,20(03):2.
 ZHONG Zhi-guo.Relationship Between Zhu Xi and Wang Yangming's Theory——Taking the View Exchanges Between Zhong Fang and Wang Yangming as an Example[J].philosophy&social sciences,2017,20(03):2.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-09-15