|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]郭明净,张荣伟.“先学后教”教学模式的实践误区及其反思[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2014,15(01):84-88.
 GUO Ming-jing,ZHANG Rong-wei.The Teaching Model of “teaching after study” Practice Misunderstanding and Reflection[J].Journal of Jimei University(Education Science Edition),2014,15(01):84-88.
点击复制

“先学后教”教学模式的实践误区及其反思()
分享到:

《集美大学学报(教育科学版)》[ISSN:1671-6493/CN:35-1238/U]

卷:
第15卷
期数:
2014年01期
页码:
84-88
栏目:
教育心理研究
出版日期:
2014-03-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Teaching Model of “teaching after study” Practice Misunderstanding and Reflection
作者:
郭明净张荣伟
(福建师范大学教育学院,福建福州350117)
Author(s):
GUO Ming-jing ZHANG Rong-wei
(College of Education, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, China)
关键词:
先教后学先学后教实践误区反思
Keywords:
first teach after learn teaching after study practice misunderstanding reflection
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
“先学后教”是对“先教后学”教学模式的突破,其核心旨意在于培养学生的创新精神和实践能力,因而特别强调自学、启发、对话,使学生真正做到会学、乐学。需要警惕的是,由于没有把握“先学后教”的精神主旨,实践中出现了绝对化、技术化、工具化倾向。作为有效教学的一种重要模式,“先学后教”应当在继承“先教后学”合理内核的基础上不断完善和超越。
Abstract:
“Teaching after study” is a breakthrough from “learning after teaching” and its core purpose is to train students’ innovative spirit and practical ability, and thus do not emphasize learning, inspiration, dialogue, so that students will be happy to learn. In teaching practice, many workers do not fundamentally grasp the “teaching after study” the core intention, inevitably fall into absolute, technical, practical tools tendency misunderstanding, and eventually the value is missing. In order to better reflect the development as a teaching model, which itself is in developing and changing, the practice should continue to learn from other theories of rational kernel improve the innovation.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-02-26