[1]刘仕凡,刘建榕.同伴接纳下大学生宿舍人际冲突中的SIP特点[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2017,18(01):31-36.
LIU Shi-fan,LIU Jian-rong.Social-Information-Processing of College Students Who Have Different Peer Acceptance in Dormitory Interpersonal Conflict Situations[J].Journal of Jimei University(Education Science Edition),2017,18(01):31-36.
点击复制
同伴接纳下大学生宿舍人际冲突中的SIP特点()
《集美大学学报(教育科学版)》[ISSN:1671-6493/CN:35-1238/U]
- 卷:
-
第18卷
- 期数:
-
2017年01期
- 页码:
-
31-36
- 栏目:
-
教育心理研究
- 出版日期:
-
2017-01-28
文章信息/Info
- Title:
-
Social-Information-Processing of College Students Who Have Different Peer Acceptance in Dormitory Interpersonal Conflict Situations
- 作者:
-
刘仕凡; 刘建榕
-
(福建师范大学教育学院,福建 福州 350117)
- Author(s):
-
LIU Shi-fan; LIU Jian-rong
-
(College of education, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, China)
-
- 关键词:
-
同伴接纳; 宿舍冲突情境; 社会信息加工(SIP)
- Keywords:
-
peer acceptance; dormitory conflict situation; social information processing(SIP)
- 分类号:
-
-
- DOI:
-
-
- 文献标志码:
-
A
- 摘要:
-
学生社会性发展问题不断涌现,采用模糊情境问卷,分别测查、比较了不同同伴接纳水平(良好、一般和较差)和男、女大学生的社会信息加工特点。探究不同同伴接纳水平和不同性别大学生在宿舍冲突情境下的SIP特点,以及其各自是否具有独特的信息加工特征。结果:不同同伴接纳水平大学生的SIP在整体上差异显著(F=2.95,p<0.01);在目标澄清、反应形成和反应评估上,三组大学生之间存在显著性差异(F=4.05,p<0.05; F=5.12,p<0.01; F=5.60,p<0.01);大学生的SIP特点在性别上的差异不显著(F=0.78,p>0.05)。结论:宿舍冲突情境下,大学生SIP特点受同伴接纳水平影响。良好组与较差组各自具有独立的社会信息加工特点。
- Abstract:
-
Objective: We examined SIP of college students, which is to investigate how peer acceptance and gender influence SIP in dormitory interpersonal conflict situations. Methods: A college students sample of 290 students (98 boys, 198 girls, average age= 202)participated in this study Assessments included peer nomination scale that was used to divide students into three groups (good, average and low) and self-reports of several elements of social-information-processing (SIP) in dormitory interpersonal conflict situations.ANOVA and MANOVA were employed to explore the SIP differences among above three groups of students.Results:Compared with the average students, low level students’ global SIP pattern is significantly different(F=2.95, p<0.01).Compared with the average students, good level students’ global SIP pattern is not significantly different(F=0.78, p>0.05).Conclusion In dormitory interpersonal conflict-situations, there are significant correlations between peer acceptance and SIP
参考文献/References:
相似文献/References:
更新日期/Last Update:
2017-03-09