化解教育史学科危机的可能性策略——基于“超学科”研究的视角-《集美大学学报（教育科学版）》

文章信息/Info

Title:: “Superdiscipline”Research：the Possibility Strategy to Crack the Crisis of the History of Education

Author(s):: YANG Jun-quan; （Department of pedagogy East China Normal University，Shanghai 200062）

Keywords:: History of Education; Discipline Crisis; interdiscipline; Superdiscipline

摘要:: 实用主义价值观盛行、研究者整体素养不高、学科研究水平滞后等造成了教育史学科的危机。超学科研究作为跨学科研究发展的更进，为审视教育史跨学科研究的困境提供了新的思路，也为理解与探寻教育史学科危机提供了可能性策略。超学科基于系统性思维，面向实践，注重相关利益主体的对话，实现了理论知识与行动知识的整合，不仅是一种研究的方法与手段，还是思维方式与方法论，更是一种理念与学术价值观，意在引导教育史学科借助其它学科理论乃至行动知识完善自身建设，进而为实践问题的解决提供更有解释力的理论支持，以至彰显自身学科的价值地位。

Abstract:: The popularity of utilitarian values，the low overall literacy of researchers and the lag of subject research level have caused the crisis of educational history discipline.As a further development of interdisciplinary research，superdiscipline research provides a new way of thinking for examining the dilemma of interdisciplinary research in educational history，and also provides a possible strategy for understanding and exploring the subject crisis of educational history.The superdiscipline is based on systematic thinking，practice-oriented，and pays attention to the dialogue of relevant stakeholders，so as to realize the integration of theoretical knowledge and action knowledge.The super-discipline is not only a method and a means of research，but also a way of thinking and methodology.It is also an idea and academic value，which is intended to guide the history of education to improve its own construction with the help of other disciplines and even the knowledge of action.Furthermore，the theoretical support for solving the problem of practice is provided with more explanatory power，so as to highlight the value position of the subject.