[1]李文灿,马和民,朱星辰.教育科技人才协同融合的内在机制与发展路径研究[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2025,26(05):1-8.
LI Wencan,MA Hemin,ZHU Xingchen.Research on the Intrinsic Mechanisms and Developmental Pathways of Collaborative Integrationamong Education,Technology,and Talent Entities[J].Journal of Jimei University(Education Science Edition),2025,26(05):1-8.
点击复制
教育科技人才协同融合的内在机制与发展路径研究(PDF)
《集美大学学报(教育科学版)》[ISSN:1671-6493/CN:35-1238/U]
- 卷:
-
第26卷
- 期数:
-
2025年05期
- 页码:
-
1-8
- 栏目:
-
社会发展研究
- 出版日期:
-
2025-10-16
文章信息/Info
- Title:
-
Research on the Intrinsic Mechanisms and Developmental Pathways of Collaborative Integrationamong Education,Technology,and Talent Entities
- 作者:
-
李文灿1; 马和民1; 朱星辰2
-
(1.华东师范大学教育学部,上海 200062;2.辽宁师范大学心理学院,辽宁 大连 116029)
- Author(s):
-
LI Wencan1; MA Hemin1; ZHU Xingchen2
-
(1.Faculty of Education,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200062,China;2.College of psychology,Liaoning Normal University,Dalian 116029,China)
-
- 关键词:
-
教育—科技—人才一体化; 结构性张力; 创新生态系统; 知识螺旋演进; 治理范式转型
- Keywords:
-
education-technology-talent integration; structural tensions; innovation ecosystem; knowledge spiral evolution; governance paradigm shift
- 分类号:
-
-
- DOI:
-
-
- 文献标志码:
-
A
- 摘要:
-
教育科技人才协同融合发展是新时代提升国家创新能力和竞争优势的战略选择。基于系统论与协同学视角,深入分析其现实矛盾、内在机制与实现路径。从结构性矛盾看,当前面临教育供给侧刚性与科技需求侧动态性的深层冲突、标准化培养与个性化需求的结构性张力、部门利益固化与系统协同要求的制度性冲突。从内在机制看,协同融合遵循价值创造的“乘数效应”内生动力机制、供需匹配的“精准对接”市场调节机制、知识螺旋的“动态演进”学习进化机制。从实现路径看,需要构建“全链条”人才培养生态实现从碎片化到系统化的根本转型,建设“深融合”协同创新平台实现从物理聚集到化学反应的质的飞跃,完善“多维度”评价激励体系实现从单一标准到多元价值的深刻变革,为建设教育强国、科技强国、人才强国提供有力支撑。
- Abstract:
-
The collaborative integration of education,technology,and talent resources has emerged as a strategic imperative to enhance national innovation capacity and global competitiveness in the digital intelligence era.This study employs theoretical frameworks from systems theory and synergy science to conduct an in-depth analysis of the conceptual foundations,practical contradictions,intrinsic mechanisms,and operational pathways underpinning the integration process.From a theoretical perspective,the collaboration represents a paradigmatic advancement from the traditional“triple helix” model to a “quadruple helix”innovation framework,reflecting the growing demand for multidisciplinary talents in the current era.This shift also underscores a persistent imbalance between talent supply and demand,evolving from a quantitative shortage to qualitative mismatch.Regarding structural tensions,the integration faces profound conflicts including the rigidity of educational supply versus the dynamic nature of technological demands,the divergence between standardized training programs and individualized competency requirements,as well as institutional frictions arising from entrenched departmental interests against the necessity for systemic coordination.The underlying mechanisms driving this integration are multifaceted.They include an endogenous multiplier effect that fosters value creation,a market-based precision alignment mechanism ensuring supply-demand matching,and a dynamic,spiraling knowledge evolution process that promotes continuous learning and adaptation.In terms of practical implementation,the study advocates for establishing a comprehensive“full-chain talent development ecosystem to achieve a fundamental transition from fragmented to systemic cultivation.It further recommends the construction of deeply integrated innovation platforms to catalyze a qualitative leap from mere physical co-location to synergistic chemical reactions.Additionally,the design of multidimensional evaluation and incentive systems is essential to transform from singular benchmarks toward pluralistic value recognition.This research concludes that while the collaborative integration of education,technology,and talent systems rests on solid theoretical grounds and responds to an undeniable practical demand,it simultaneously confronts intricate structural contradictions and institutional barriers.Addressing these challenges requires systemic pathway design and innovative mechanism reform,thereby enabling these sectors to converge at a higher level of synergy.Such advancement will significantly support the strategic goals of building a strong nation in education,science and technology,and human capital development.
参考文献/References:
相似文献/References:
更新日期/Last Update:
2025-10-16