|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]杨颖,鲁小周,罗思亮.留守儿童主观生活质量与社会支持的关系[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2016,17(05):23-27.
　YANG Ying,LU Xiao-zhou,LUO Si-liang.The Relation between Quality of Life and Social Support in left-behind Children[J].Journal of Jimei University(Education Science Edition),2016,17(05):23-27.
点击复制

留守儿童主观生活质量与社会支持的关系()
分享到：

《集美大学学报（教育科学版）》[ISSN:1671-6493/CN:35-1238/U]

卷:
第17卷
期数:
2016年05期
页码:
23-27
栏目:
教育心理研究
出版日期:
2016-09-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Relation between Quality of Life and Social Support in left-behind Children
作者:
杨颖; 鲁小周; 罗思亮
（安顺学院教育科学学院，贵州安顺561000）
Author(s):
YANG Ying;  LU Xiao-zhou; LUO Si-liang
(School of Education Science,Anshun University, Anshun 561000, China)
关键词:
主观生活质量; 社会支持; 留守儿童
Keywords:
quality of life;  social support ;  left-behind children
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
探讨留守儿童主观生活质量及与社会支持的关系，为提高其生活满意度提供依据。采用儿少主观生活质量量表（ISLQ）和青少年社会支持量表对贵州省379名留守儿童与316名非留守儿童进行测查。结果显示：762%的留守儿童的主观生活质量处于中等及以下水平，其得分显著低于非留守儿童；不同家庭经济状况、学业成绩、留守类型的留守儿童的主观生活质量存在显著差异；主观生活质量与社会支持及各维度存在显著正相关；主观支持与客观支持对主观生活质量具有正向预测作用，两者能共同解释主观生活质量得分变异的26%。结论：留守儿童的主观生活质量总体偏低，提高其社会支持可有助于提高其主观生活质量，主观支持和客观支持是影响其主观生活质量的重要因素。
Abstract:
Objectives: To explore the characteristics of quality of life and its relationship with social support in left-behind Children, in order to provide reference for improving their life satisfaction. Methods: A total of 379 left-behind children and 316 non-left-behind children in Guizhou Province were surveyed by using Inventory of Subjective Life Quality (ISLQ) and adolescent social support scale. Results:76.2% of the left-behind children’s life quality was in the middle and below the level, the score was significantly lower than that of the non-left-behind children. There existed significant difference at the score of life quality among different family economic status, academic achievement and types of left-behind in left behind children. There were significant positive correlations between the score of life quality and the scores of the total and three factors of social support. The scores of subjective support and objective support could positively forecast the scores of life quality, both of which could collectively account for 26% of the score variability of life quality. Conclusion：he quality of life of the left behind children is generally low, and the improvement of social support may be helpful for improving the level of their quality of life, the subjective support and objective support are the important factors influencing the quality of life.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]鲁小周,杨颖.少数民族幼儿教师职业倦怠与社会支持的关系研究——以贵州省实地调查为例[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2018,19(02):34.
　LU Xiao-zhou,YANG Ying.Relationship between Job Burnout and Social Support in Kindergarten Ethnic-Minority Teachers from Guizhou[J].Journal of Jimei University(Education Science Edition),2018,19(05):34.
[2]张建兴.大学生人格特质、社会支持、自我和谐与生活满意度的关系[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2018,19(05):37.
　ZHANG Jian-xing.Personality Traits, Social Support, Self-harmony, and Life Satisfaction of University Students[J].Journal of Jimei University(Education Science Edition),2018,19(05):37.
[3]张珊珊,张野.初中生反社会行为特质与校园欺凌的关系——基于社会支持与自我控制的链式中介作用[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2018,19(06):24.
　ZHANG SHAN-shan,ZHANG Ye.Relationship between Junior High School Students’ Antisocial Behavior Traits and School Bullying——The Chain Mediating Roles of Social Support and Self-control[J].Journal of Jimei University(Education Science Edition),2018,19(05):24.
[4]陈昕仪,高华.社会支持对大学生睡眠质量的影响——核心自我评价与焦虑的链式中介作用[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2022,23(06):44.
　CHEN Xin-yi,GAO Hua.The Effect of Social Support on Sleep Quailty of College Students——The Chain Mediating Effects of Core Selfevaluation and Anxiety[J].Journal of Jimei University(Education Science Edition),2022,23(05):44.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-11-19