«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《集美大学学报（教育科学版）》[ISSN:1671-6493/CN:35-1238/U]

卷:

第18卷

期数:

2017年02期

页码:

5-11

栏目:

教师发展研究

出版日期:

2017-03-28

文章信息/Info

Title:

The Development and Application of the Motivating Style Scale for College Teachers

作者:

胡艳婷; 贺雯; 郭思倩; 丁炜

（上海师范大学教育学院，上海232038）

Author(s):

HU Yan-ting;  HE Wen;  GUO Si-qian;  DING Wei

(Education Science Institute in Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 232038, China)

关键词:

高校教师; 激励风格; 问卷编制; 信效度

Keywords:

college teachers;  motivating style;  development questionnaire

分类号:

-

DOI:

-

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

该研究编制了我国高校教师激励风格问卷，并对227名民办高校青年教师进行了调查研究，结果表明：高校教师激励风格是一个多维结构，包括目标激励、自主激励、关系激励和控制激励四个维度。高校教师激励风格问卷具有较好的信度和效度。民办高校青年教师倾向于采用目标激励的方式激发学生的学习动机，其次是关系激励，再次是自主激励，较少采用控制激励的方式。民办高校青年教师的激励风格在关系激励维度上，女教师得分显著低于男教师得分，不同学历的教师的激励风格不存在显著差异。

Abstract:

The Motivating Style Scale for College Teachers was produced after papers conclusion, open questionnaire, personal interview. With the scale, it investigated 227 college young teachers. The results showed: The Motivating Style Scale consists of four parts, namely, the target motivating strategy, the relationship motivating strategy, the autonomy motivating strategy, and the controlling motivating strategy. There were good theoretical conception, high reliability, and high validity about the scale. The college young teachers tended to motive students’learning by the target motivating strategy , followed by the relationship motivating strategy and the autonomy motivating strategy,less by controlling motivating strategy. 4. The difference of the target motivating strategy were significant in sex and the difference of the relationship motivating strategy were significant in age, but the difference of the motivating style were not significant in school age and education.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]郑洁.高校教师胜任力发展水平与类型的实证研究[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2015,16(05):23.
　ZHENG Jie.Empirical Study on the Level and Type of College Teachers’ Competency[J].Journal of Jimei University(Education Science Edition),2015,16(02):23.
[2]陈丽烟.福建省高校教师信息技术应用能力调查研究[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2016,17(02):25.
　CHEN Li-yan.Investigation and Research on Fujian College Tteacher’ Sability of Applying Information Technology[J].Journal of Jimei University(Education Science Edition),2016,17(02):25.
[3]林思涵.基于多学科视角的高校教师性骚扰现象探析[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2015,16(04):7.
　LIN Si-han.A Research of University Teachers Sexual Harassment Phenomenon Based on Multidisciplinary Perspective[J].Journal of Jimei University(Education Science Edition),2015,16(02):7.
[4]李颖.高校教师职称评审的法律分析——一起经典诉讼案之再探[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2014,15(03):6.
　LI Ying.Legal Analysis on Title Review of College Teachers——Re-exploring a Classic Case[J].Journal of Jimei University(Education Science Edition),2014,15(02):6.
[5]吴颖,崔玉平.我国高校教师绩效管理的问题分析与对策选择[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2017,18(01):13.
　WU Ying,CUI Yu-ping.On Problems Analysis and Strategies Selection of College Teachers’ Performance Management[J].Journal of Jimei University(Education Science Edition),2017,18(02):13.
[6]陈红艳,刘霞.转型期高校教师工作家庭冲突调查与分析[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2017,18(03):7.
　CHEN Hong-yan,LIU Xia.Investigation and Analysis on the Work-family Conflict of Teachers in University during Transition Period[J].Journal of Jimei University(Education Science Edition),2017,18(02):7.
[7]郑崇明,徐望来.任务清晰度、相对获得感与高校教师的注意力分配[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2018,19(01):21.
　ZHENG Chong-ming,XU Wang-lai.Task Definition, Relative Perception of Reward and the Distribution of College Teachers’ Attention[J].Journal of Jimei University(Education Science Edition),2018,19(02):21.
[8]林琳.高校思政课教师话语主导权的困境与出路[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2019,20(04):57.
　LIN Lin.On Dilemmas and Solutions to College Teachers’Discourse Dominance in Ideological Theory Courses[J].Journal of Jimei University(Education Science Edition),2019,20(02):57.
[9]王中华,朱国梁.高校教师教学与科研辩证关系的再思考[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2022,23(04):7.
　WANG Zhong-hua,ZHU Guo-liang.Review and Prospect of the Research on the Dialectical Relationship between Teaching and Research of University Teachersin China[J].Journal of Jimei University(Education Science Edition),2022,23(02):7.
[10]孟祥林.中西高校教师综合评价制度的比较与借鉴[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2023,24(01):44.
　MENG Xiang-lin.Comparison and Reference of Comprehensive Evaluation System for University Teachers Between China and The West[J].Journal of Jimei University(Education Science Edition),2023,24(02):44.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-05-19