|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]许淑瑶.违反合作原则的夫妻冲突话语的语言策略描述——以《绝望主妇》为语料[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2019,22(01):123-129.
 XU Shu-yao.Descriptive Statistics of Language Strategy in the Violation of the Cooperative Principle in the Conflict Talk between Couples——A Case Study on Desperate Housewives[J].philosophy&social sciences,2019,22(01):123-129.
点击复制

违反合作原则的夫妻冲突话语的语言策略描述——以《绝望主妇》为语料(PDF)
分享到:

《集美大学学报》(哲社版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
22
期数:
2019年01期
页码:
123-129
栏目:
出版日期:
2019-01-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Descriptive Statistics of Language Strategy in the Violation of the Cooperative Principle in the Conflict Talk between Couples——A Case Study on Desperate Housewives
作者:
许淑瑶
(集美大学 海外教育学院,福建 厦门 361021)
Author(s):
XU Shu-yao
(OEC of Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China)
关键词:
合作原则冲突话语语言策略性别差异
Keywords:
Cooperative Principle conflict talk language strategy gender difference
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
当有一方在理的夫妻发生冲突话语时,双方都会违反合作原则及其各准则,并且两性各自侧重使用的语言策略不同。因为男性不仅在身体外表上比女性强壮,而且在社会上属于统治地位,所以男性偏爱使用祈使句、姓名称呼和反意疑问句等强势类型的语言策略;女性则侧重使用对偶、粗话、排比、动词进行时、夸张、引用、反复、正式语言、反语、疑问句和否定等感情类型的语言策略。研究结果对进一步把握性别差异与语言策略使用之间的互动关系具有较好的理论和实践指导意义。
Abstract:
Both of the couples violate the Cooperative Principle and its maxims in their conflicts in which one of the couple is surely reasonable, and they respectively prefer to adopt different language strategies. Men are not only stronger than women physically, but they are also the dominant in the society. As a result, men focus on the powerful language strategy, and they prefer the strategies of imperative statement, name address and tag question; however, women emphasize the emotional language strategy, and they concentrate on the strategies of antithesis, coarse language, parallelism, be Ving, overstatement, quotation, repetition, formal language, irony, question, and negative. The research result helps understand the gender difference more precisely and use language strategy more effectively in both theory and practice.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]张结根.冲突话语研究四十年[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2020,23(02):123.
 ZHANG Jie-gen.A Review of Conflict Talk Research[J].philosophy&social sciences,2020,23(01):123.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-03-10