«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《集美大学学报（自然科学版）》[ISSN:1007-7405/CN:35-1186/N]

卷:

第25卷

期数:

2020年第3期

页码:

171-179

栏目:

水产、食品与生物工程

出版日期:

2020-05-28

文章信息/Info

Title:

Effects of Low Salinity Culture on Growth，Muscle Nutritional Composition and Antioxidant Capacity of Larimichthys crocea

作者:

吴益星1; 2; 叶坤1; 2; 王志勇1; 2; 何松蓉1; 2; 王秋荣1; 2

(1.集美大学水产学院,福建 厦门 361021 ;2.农业部东海海水健康养殖重点实验室,福建 厦门 361021 )

Author(s):

WU Yixing1; 2; YE Kun1; 2; WANG Zhiyong1; 2; HE Songrong1; 2; WANG Qiurong1; 2

(1.Fisheries College，Jimei University，Xiamen 361021，China；2.Key Laboratory of Healthy Mariculture for the East China Sea，Ministry of Agriculture，Xiamen 361021，China)

关键词:

大黄鱼; 低盐养殖; 生长; 肌肉营养成分; 抗氧化能力

Keywords:

Larimichthys crocea; low salinity culture; growth; nutritional composition; antioxidant capacity

分类号:

-

DOI:

-

文献标志码:

-

摘要:

为探讨低盐养殖对大黄鱼生长、体成分及抗氧化能力的影响，挑选初始体重为(53.59±25.10)g的大黄鱼幼鱼600尾，分为对照组（天然海水，盐度24）和低盐组（盐度10）两组，每组设3个重复，进行为期60 d的养殖试验。试验结果表明：低盐养殖大黄鱼增重率及特定生长率显著高于对照组（P<0.05）；肌肉的粗蛋白质和粗灰分含量分别显著高于和低于对照组（P<0.05），粗脂肪略低于对照组，但没有显著差异（P>0.05）；低盐组大黄鱼肌肉∑MUFA显著低于对照组，而∑PUFA显著高于对照组（P<0.05）；低盐养殖组大黄鱼肝脏与肾脏组织中总抗氧化能力（T-AOC）、过氧化氢酶（CAT）活性显著高于对照组（P＜0.05）；超氧化物歧化酶（SOD）、谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶（GSH-PX）活性及丙二醛（MDA）含量均显著低于对照组（P＜0.05）。

Abstract:

In order to investigate the effects of low salinity culture on the growth，muscle nutritional composition and antioxidant capacity of large yellow croaker（Larimichthys crocea），a total of 600 juvenile large yellow croaker with an initial body weight of（53.59±25.10)g were randomly divided into two groups（natural seawater group，salinity 24；low salinity group，salinity 10) with three replicates per group.Fish were reared in an indoor cement tank（2.5m×1.2m×0.8m）for 60 d.The results showed that the weight gain rate（WGR）and specific growth rate（SGR）of fish in low salinity group was significantly higher than those in the control group (P<0.05).The contents of muscle crude protein and ash of large yellow croaker in the low salinity group were significantly higher and lower than those of the control group，respectively.There was no significant difference in the muscle crude lipid between two groups (P>0.05).The ∑MUFA content in muscle of the large yellow croaker in low salinity group was significantly lower than that in the control group，while the ∑PUFA content was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05).The total antioxidant capacity（T-AOC) and catalase（CAT) activity in liver and kidney of large yellow croaker in low salinity group were significantly higher than those in control group (P<0.05).But the activity of superoxide dismutase(SOD),glutathione peroxidase（GSH-PX) and the content of malondialdehyde（MDA) in liver and kidney of large yellow croaker in control group were significantly higher than those in low salinity group (P<0.05).

参考文献/References:

-

相似文献/References:

[1]王晓清,王志勇,何湘蓉.大黄鱼40日龄体长和体重遗传力估计[J].集美大学学报(自然科学版),2010,15(1):7.
[2]蔡明夷,刘贤德,陈庆凯,等.温度对大黄鱼受精卵卵裂间隔时间的影响[J].集美大学学报(自然科学版),2010,15(3):161.
[3]王秋荣,赵述建,林利民,等.轮虫中n-3HUFA含量对大黄鱼仔鱼生长与存活的影响[J].集美大学学报(自然科学版),2010,15(4):262.
　WANG Qiu-rong,ZHAO Shu-jian,LIN Li-min,et al.Effects of the n-3HUFA Contents in Rotifers Brachionus plicatilison the Growth and Survival of Larval Large Yellow CrockerPseudosciaena crocea[J].Journal of Jimei University,2010,15(3):262.
[4]隋班良,蔡明夷,刘颖,等.黄姑鱼♀与大黄鱼♂杂交试验与AFLP分析[J].集美大学学报(自然科学版),2012,17(4):241.
　SUI Ban-liangCAI Ming-yiLIU YingWANG Zhi-yong.Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis on Hybrid Family Between Nibea albiflora and Larimichthys crocea[J].Journal of Jimei University,2012,17(3):241.
[5]蔡明夷,刘贤德,翁朝红,等.大黄鱼与黄姑鱼杂交F1及其双亲的核型分析[J].集美大学学报(自然科学版),2012,17(5):321.
　CAI Ming-yi,LIU Xian-de,WENG Zhao-hong,et al.Karyotypes of Larimichthys crocea and Nibea albiflora and Their Hybrids[J].Journal of Jimei University,2012,17(3):321.
[6]杨洁,武祥伟,刘贤德,等.大黄鱼(Larimichthys crocea)fAFLP方法的建立[J].集美大学学报(自然科学版),2013,18(1):1.
　YANG Jie,WU Xiang-wei,LIU Xian-de,et al.Exploration of fAFLP Method in Large Yellow Croaker( Larimichthys crocea)[J].Journal of Jimei University,2013,18(3):1.
[7]曾荣林,谢仰杰,王志勇,等.大黄鱼幼鱼对低盐度的耐受性研究[J].集美大学学报(自然科学版),2013,18(3):167.
　ZENG Rong-lin,XIE Yang-jie,WANG Zhi-yong,et al.Tolerance of Young Fish of Large Yellow Croaker(Larimichthys crocea) to Low Salinity[J].Journal of Jimei University,2013,18(3):167.
[8]韦信键,刘贤德,王志勇.32个大黄鱼家系早期阶段生长性状比较及遗传参数估计[J].集美大学学报(自然科学版),2013,18(5):321.
　WEI Xin-jian,LIU Xian-de,WANG Zhi-yong.The Comparison of Growth-related Traits in the Early Stage and Its Genetic Parameter Estimation of 32 Large Yellow Croaker Families Larimichthys crocea[J].Journal of Jimei University,2013,18(3):321.
[9]王程程,鄢庆枇,黄伟卿,等.福建三沙湾养殖大黄鱼肠道菌群研究[J].集美大学学报(自然科学版),2014,19(1):1.
　WANG Cheng-cheng,YAN Qing-pi,HUANG Wei-qing,et al.Study on Intestinal Bacteria of Cultured Large Yellow Croaker (Pseudosciaena crocea) in Sansha Bay，Fujian Province[J].Journal of Jimei University,2014,19(3):1.
[10]谌微,王盼盼,肖世俊,等.大黄鱼形态指标体系及雌雄差异分析[J].集美大学学报(自然科学版),2014,19(6):401.
　CHEN Wei,WANG Pan-pan,XIAO Shi-jun,et al.Analysis of Morphological Index System and Sexual Differences of Large Yellow Croaker（Larimichthys crocea)[J].Journal of Jimei University,2014,19(3):401.
[11]金希哲,陈庆凯,叶坤,等.低盐养殖大黄鱼部分器官的组织学特征[J].集美大学学报(自然科学版),2015,20(2):90.
　JIN Xi-zhe,CHEN Qing-kai,YE Kun,et al.The Histological Studies on Some Organs of Large Yellow Croaker,Larimichthys crocea Reared in Low Salinity Water[J].Journal of Jimei University,2015,20(3):90.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

-

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2020-07-16