[1]李长春.廖平经学视野中的宋明儒学[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2014,17(04):18-23.
LI Chang-chun.Liao Ping’s Criticism of Neo-Confucianism[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(04):18-23.
点击复制
廖平经学视野中的宋明儒学()
LI Chang-chun.Liao Ping’s Criticism of Neo-Confucianism[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(04):18-23.
《集美大学学报》（哲社版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]
- 卷:
- 17
- 期数:
- 2014年04期
- 页码:
- 18-23
- 栏目:
- 出版日期:
- 2014-12-31
文章信息/Info
- Title:
- Liao Ping’s Criticism of Neo-Confucianism
- 作者:
- 李长春
- （中山大学哲学系，广东 广州 510275）
- Author(s):
- LI Chang-chun
- （Department of Philosophy, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China）
- Keywords:
- Liao Ping; classics; NeoConfucianism
- 分类号:
- -
- DOI:
- -
- 文献标志码:
- A
- 摘要:
- 廖平经学有其独特的政治视野。从这一政治视野出发，廖平对中国古典政教体系有着敏锐的洞察和深刻的反思。他批评宋儒尊孟贬荀不得其真，误解《大学》“修身”之旨，昧于时势错认“道统”，先知后行，颠倒人天。这些批评既是针对宋明儒学内在的义理结构，又涉及到宋明儒学的历史文化功能，对于思考当代儒学的发展如何超越宋明儒学具有重要的参考价值。
- Abstract:
- Liao Ping’s research on Chinese classical political system has a keen insight and profound reflection. He criticized the Song Dynasty philosophers, because they admired Mencius but belittled Xun Zi. He thought that these philosophers misunderstood the meaning of “cultivate one’s morality”. These criticisms are against the NeoConfucianism theory structure, and involve the historical and cultural features of NeoConfucianism. Therefore, his criticisms are of great significance for the development of contemporary Confucianism.
参考文献/References:
相似文献/References:
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
常用功能
统计/Statistics
- 摘要浏览/Viewed2181
- 评论/Comments
更新日期/Last Update:
2017-03-12