|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]沈顺福.理即气——论罗钦顺对朱子的继承与超越[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2018,21(03):22-28.
　SHEN Shun -fu.Li Is Qi: Luo Qinshun’s Inheritance of and Surpass over Zhu Xi’s Philosophy[J].philosophy&social sciences,2018,21(03):22-28.
点击复制

理即气——论罗钦顺对朱子的继承与超越(PDF)
分享到：

《集美大学学报》（哲社版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
21
期数:
2018年03期
页码:
22-28
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-07-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Li Is Qi: Luo Qinshun’s Inheritance of and Surpass over Zhu Xi’s Philosophy
作者:
沈顺福
（山东大学 儒学高等研究院，山东 济南 250100）
Author(s):
SHEN Shun -fu
(Advanced Institute of Confucian Studies, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China)
关键词:
罗钦顺; 理; 气
Keywords:
Luo Qinshun;  Li;  Qi
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
朱熹哲学的最大问题是理气二元论。罗钦顺继承了朱熹的哲学，以为理是万物的终极性本原。他同时以为气也是万物的本原。和朱熹区分二者不同的是，罗钦顺提出，超越性的、终极性的理其实也是气，理即气。理和气的关系不是统一关系，而是重合关系，即理是气的某个部分或某种形态。这完全是一种实在论的立场。据此，罗钦顺克服并超越了朱熹哲学。
Abstract:
Dualism of Li and Qi is the primary issue of Zhu Xi’s philosophy. Luo Qinshun adheres to Zhu’s view that Li is the ultimate source of all substances and at the same time Luo believes that Qi is also the source of all substances. However, different from Zhu, Luo advocates that the transcending and ultimate Li is actually Qi, convinced that the two are not unified but overlapped instead, that is, Li is a part or a form of Qi. This is completely a realistic view, and thereby transcends Zhu’s philosophy.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]蔡家和.朱子四书的理学建构[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2017,20(01):1.
　CAI Jia-he.The Construction of Zhu Xi’s Neo-Confucianism[J].philosophy&social sciences,2017,20(03):1.
[2]陈颖聪.明人对诗中“抒情”“言理”“议政”的思考[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2022,25(03):59.
　CHEN Ying-cong.The Ming Dynasty Literati’s Reflections on “Emotions”,“Reasoning” and “Politics” in Poems[J].philosophy&social sciences,2022,25(03):59.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-09-13