[1]许翠霞,罗晓梅,黄长太.环境行政公益诉讼诉前程序实证研究[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2019,22(01):72-78.
XU Cui-xia,LUO Xiao-mei,HUANG Chang-tai.An Empirical Study on Environmental Administrative Public Interest Litigation in the Pre-litigation Procedure[J].philosophy&social sciences,2019,22(01):72-78.
点击复制
《集美大学学报》(哲社版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]
- 卷:
-
22
- 期数:
-
2019年01期
- 页码:
-
72-78
- 栏目:
-
- 出版日期:
-
2019-01-28
文章信息/Info
- Title:
-
An Empirical Study on Environmental Administrative Public Interest Litigation in the Pre-litigation Procedure
- 作者:
-
许翠霞1; 罗晓梅2; 黄长太3
-
(1.集美大学法学院,福建 厦门 361021;2.福建省三明市清流县人民法院,福建 清流 365300;3.福建省厦门市同安区人民检察院,福建 厦门 361021)
- Author(s):
-
XU Cui-xia1; LUO Xiao-mei2; HUANG Chang-tai3
-
(1.School of Law, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China; 2. People’s Court of Qingliu County, Sanming City, Fujian Province, Qingliu 365300, China; 3. The People’s Procuratorate of Tongan District, Xiamen City, Fujian Province, Xiamen 361021, China)
-
- 关键词:
-
环境行政公益诉讼; 诉前程序; 检察建议; 行政检察监督
- Keywords:
-
environmental administrative public interest litigation; The pre-litigation procedure; procuratorial Suggestions; administrative procuratorial supervision
- 分类号:
-
-
- DOI:
-
-
- 文献标志码:
-
A
- 摘要:
-
作为环境行政公益诉讼的法定前置程序,诉前程序在督促环保执法机构依法履职等方面发挥了重要作用,但实践中环保执法机构是否履职到位缺乏认定标准、诉前程序没有明确的操作规范、检察机关的调查取证能力不足等问题日益突出。对此展开了实证研究,细化了行政不作为及环保执法机构是否履职到位的认定机制;提出规范检察建议的操作细则,建立约谈或听证制度,加强与人大、监察委的机制衔接以落实有效监督;建议赋予检察机关以一定的强制措施权,建立检察机关与环保执法机构之间的信息共享及联席会议制度,以提升检察机关调查取证能力。
- Abstract:
-
As a mandatory prepositive procedure of environmental administrative public interest litigation, the pre-litigation procedure plays an important role in urging environmental law enforcement agencies to perform their legal duties. But it also faces triple dilemmas, including the difficulties to determine if the environmental law enforcement agencies have fulfilled their duties properly, lack of clear operation standards in pre-litigation procedures, and incapability of investigation and evidence collection of the procuratorial organs. Based on the empirical study, this paper puts forward a concrete solution to perfect the prelitigation procedure. It involves a detailed identification mechanism of administrative omission and unfulfillment, as well as standardizing the operation detailed rules of procuratorial suggestions, establishing the system of making inquiries or hearing, and strengthening the coordination with the National People’s Congress and the commission of supervision to implement effective oversight. Beside this, it also suggests that procuratorial organs should be given the power of compulsory measures to facilitate their diversified exercise of the right of investigation and verification, and establish the information sharing and joint meeting system between procutatorial organs and environmental law enforcement agencies to improve the capacity of investigation and evidence collection of procuratorial organs.
参考文献/References:
相似文献/References:
更新日期/Last Update:
2019-03-10