|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]孙沁.新见两孤本《淮海居士长短句》考论[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2024,27(01):69-74.
　SUN Qin.A Study of Two Newly Discovered Versions of Qin Guan’s Ci[J].philosophy&social sciences,2024,27(01):69-74.
点击复制

新见两孤本《淮海居士长短句》考论(PDF)
分享到：

《集美大学学报》（哲社版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
27
期数:
2024年01
页码:
69-74
栏目:
出版日期:
2024-02-26

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Study of Two Newly Discovered Versions of Qin Guan’s Ci
作者:
孙沁
福建师范大学文学院,福建 福州 350007
Author(s):
SUN Qin
College of Chinese Language and Literature, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China
关键词:
淮海词; 版本; 孤本
Keywords:
Qin Guan’s Ci;  version;  the only copy
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
由于主、客观原因，研究淮海词的学者们对明正德黄瓒山东刻本和明正德辛巳孟春晖编刻本几无寓目，鲜少提及，对于明嘉靖之前的淮海词版本，几乎没有详细的讨论。然而，经过笔者比较及研究发现，这两个版本不仅是海内外孤本，还是考察淮海词在明嘉靖之前的版本流变情况极为重要的存在，值得重视并作进一步的详细研究。
Abstract:
For subjective and objective reasons, scholars who study Qin Guan’s Ci have rarely mentioned the version by Huang Zan and the version by Meng Chunhui, so there is no discussion on the version of Qin Guan’s Ci before Jiajing period of the Ming Dynasty. However, after comparison and research, the author has found that these two versions are not only the only copies both at home and abroad, but also extremely important ones for investigating the changes of the versions of Qin Guan’s Ci before Jiajing period of the Ming Dynasty. They are worthy of further studying.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]肖满省.蔡清“虚斋三书”版本源流及其学术价值[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2019,22(04):15.
　XIAO Man-sheng.The Different Versions and the Academic Values of the Three Books by Xuzhai[J].philosophy&social sciences,2019,22(01):15.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-04-15