|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]张恒.理学的发生:一个天人学视域的分析[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,21(03):7-15.
 ZHANG Heng.The Origin of Neo-Confucianism: An analysis from the Perspective of Heaven-Man Theory[J].philosophy&social sciences,2018,21(03):7-15.
点击复制

理学的发生:一个天人学视域的分析(PDF)
分享到:

《集美大学学报》(哲学社会科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
21
期数:
2018年03期
页码:
7-15
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-07-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Origin of Neo-Confucianism: An analysis from the Perspective of Heaven-Man Theory
作者:
张恒
(山东大学 儒学高等研究院,山东 济南 250100)
Author(s):
ZHANG Heng
(Advanced Institute of Confucian Studies, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China)
关键词:
理学天人学天人合一本原生存
Keywords:
Neo-Confucianism origin Heaven-Man theory Heaven-Man unity origin living
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
宋明理学是儒学乃至中华文明的重要一期。以往以存在论为理论框架对理学发生问题的哲学解读有一定道理,但是忽视了中国哲学的特点。实际上,理学“制造者”一方面承续魏晋“天人一体”观以反对佛道二教“裂天人为二”的做法,另一方面又借鉴佛教高度思辨的“体—相—用”思维以解决魏晋哲学“本—末”思维的缺陷。理学的核心使命是寻找“天人合一”的宇宙生命体之本原,亦即人类生存之本原,它不单是存在论的,更是生存论的。理学家对生存本原的追问是通过性的二分、道的理化及性理合一实现的。
Abstract:
Neo-Confucianism is an important stage of Confucianism and even the Chinese civilization. The interpretations on the origin of Neo-Confucianism from the perspective of ontology in the past made some sense, but ignored the features of Chinese philosophy. In fact, philosophers of Neo-Confucianism inherited the Heaven-Man unity theory of the philosophers in the Wei and Jin Dynasties and objected to the opposite theory of Buddhism and Taoism. On the other hand, philosophers of Neo-Confucianism drew lessons from the Substance-Appearance-Function theory of Buddhism in order to overcome the flaws of Root-Branch theory which belonged to the philosophers of the Wei and Jin Dynasties. The core mission of Neo-Confucianism is to find the origin of the living universe in which heaven and man are integrated, also the source of human living. Philosophers of Neo-Confucianism explored the source of living through three stages: the division of Xing (性), the transformation of Tao (道) into Li (理), the integration of Xing and Li.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]谷继明.从执一统众到理一分殊——试论魏晋到赵宋政治哲学的一个变化[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,17(04):7.
 GU Ji-ming.From “Governing the Numerous Things with the ONE” to “One Principle in Different Things”——A Change of Political Philosophy from Wei and Jin Dynasties to the Song Dynasty[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(03):7.
[2]王强,王汐牟.理学与明代福建省志编修[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,21(01):5.
 WANG Qiang,WANG Xi-mou.Influence of Neo-Confucianism on Fujian Chronicles Compiling in the Ming Dynasty[J].philosophy&social sciences,2018,21(03):5.
[3]衷鑫恣.作为乡绅的朱熹[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,21(04):25.
 ZHONG Xin-zi.Zhu Xi as a Scholar-Esquire[J].philosophy&social sciences,2018,21(03):25.
[4]王建生.北宋晚期理学传承剪影[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,22(02):9.
 WANG Jian-sheng.An Epitome of the Inheritance of Neo-Confucianism in the Late Northern Song Dynasty[J].philosophy&social sciences,2019,22(03):9.
[5]于芝涵.“范式转移”视域下的宋代经学学术话语转型[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2021,24(02):57.
 YU Zhi-han.Transformation of Academic Discourse of Confucian Classics in the Song Dynasty under the Vision of“Paradigm-Shift” Theory[J].philosophy&social sciences,2021,24(03):57.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-09-13