|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]代中强.知识产权名义保护、实际保护与发展中国家福利——以南京市江宁区为例[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2014,17(02):58-65.
　DAI Zhong -qiang.Nominal Intellectual Property Protection, Real Protection and Welfare of Developing Countries[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(02):58-65.
点击复制

知识产权名义保护、实际保护与发展中国家福利——以南京市江宁区为例()
分享到：

《集美大学学报》（哲社版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
17
期数:
2014年02期
页码:
58-65
栏目:
出版日期:
2014-06-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Nominal Intellectual Property Protection, Real Protection and Welfare of Developing Countries
作者:
代中强
（集美大学财经学院，福建 厦门 361021）
Author(s):
DAI Zhong -qiang
(College of Finance and Economics, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China)
关键词:
知识产权; 名义保护; 实际保护; 发展中国家福利
Keywords:
intellectual property;  nominal protection;  real protection;  the welfare of developing countries
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
开放经济条件下，知识产权保护的外部压力和内部利益集团的诉求使得发展中国家出现名义知识产权保护趋同，而实际知识产权保护不均质的现象。从对外贸易、外商直接投资以及研究开发三个方面梳理知识产权对发展中国家的福利影响，发现现有文献研究知识产权保护对发展中国家福利影响的结论模棱两可，政策含义也非常含糊，其原因在于基本没有区分知识产权的名义保护和实际保护，因此，需要在区别的基础上展开进一步研究，最后进行总结评论并提出该领域未来可以进一步拓展的方向。
Abstract:
In open economy system, the pressure of externally strong IPR protection and the internal interests’ appeal result in the phenomenon that nominal IPR protection is homogeneous but real IPR protection is not in the developing countries. This paper summarizes the IPR effect on the welfare of developing countries from the perspective of foreign trade, foreign direct investment, and research and development. We find that most of the available literature studies its impact on developing countries, and then comes to wrong or even completely opposite conclusions. At the same time, the policy implication is also very vague. The reason is that the existing literature does not distinguish between the nominal and the real IPR protection. It is therefore suggested that further research should be based on their difference.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]代中强.知识产权调查引致的贸易壁垒：一个统计分析[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2016,19(01):30.
　Trade Barrier Caused by Intellectual Property Investigation: A Statistical Analysis.Trade Barrier Caused by Intellectual Property Investigation: A Statistical Analysis[J].philosophy&social sciences,2016,19(02):30.
[2]庄智博.商标合理使用：对商标权限制的误读——以武夷山、湄洲岛为例[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2014,17(03):98.
　ZHUANG Zhi -bo.Trademark Fair Use: A Misreading of Trademark Rights Restrictions[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(02):98.
[3]朱一青.跨境交易模式下司法反避税研究——基于知识产权法视角的路径分析[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2020,23(04):86.
　ZHU Yi-qing.Judicial Anti-avoidance Solutions:A Perspective of Intellectual Property Law under Cross-border Trading Model[J].philosophy&social sciences,2020,23(02):86.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-03-11