«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《集美大学学报》（哲社版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:

17

期数:

2014年03期

页码:

71-76

栏目:

出版日期:

2014-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:

Huang Daozhou and Song Ming Neo-Confucianism and Zhuism

作者:

翟奎凤

（山东大学儒学高等研究学院，山东 济南 250100）

Author(s):

ZHAI Kui-feng

(Advanced Institute for Confucian Studies, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China)

关键词:

黄道周; 朱子学; 复古; 汉宋

Keywords:

Huang Daozhou;  Zhuism;  return to the ancients;  Han Song

分类号:

-

DOI:

-

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

黄道周是明末著名大儒，他在政治、哲学思想、文学艺术等领域都有着重要影响，同时以人品气节为时人和后人所称颂。由于家乡漳州的朱子文化氛围以及父亲对朱子的崇敬，黄道周早年受到朱子学的很大影响，这使他终生都对朱子非常尊敬。但黄道周身处明末的复杂思想格局，他并不是一位纯粹的朱子学学者，由于他对朱子甚至宋明儒在一些根本问题上都有过尖锐的批评，黄道周在一定意义上已经超越了宋明理学的藩篱，成为一位兼具汉宋风格又有突出特色的独立思想家。正是出于这种原因，黄宗羲《明儒学案》把他归到诸儒学案。

Abstract:

Huang Daozhou was a celebrated Confucianist in the late Ming Dynasty, who had an important influence on politics, philosophic thinking and literature and art. Meanwhile he was praised by people of that age and later generations for his personality integrity. Owing to Zhuzi cultural atmosphere in his hometown of Zhangzhou and his father’s reverence for Zhuzi, Zhuism impacted him greatly in his early ages, and made him respect Zhuzi all his life. But Huang Daozhou was not a pure Zhuist, since he lived in the late Ming Dynasty, which was a time abounding with complex thoughts. He had incisive criticisms on some basic principles of Zhuzi and Song Ming Neo-Confucianists. In this sense, he went beyond the limits of Song Ming Neo-Confucianism, and became an independent thinker who had Han Song style and prominent characteristics. And because of that, Huang Zongxi placed him on Confucianism case in his Ming Confucianism Cases.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]曾进兴,施婧,吴洁.史迹遗玉的环境压力与现实突围——清代以来保护黄道周文化史迹的实践与思考[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2014,17(03):77.
　ZENG Jin-xing,SHI Jing,WU Jie.The Environmental Pressure for Historical Heritage and Its Practical Breakthrough ——Practice and Thinking on the Protection of Huang Daozhou Cultural Heritage from the Qing Dynasty[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(03):77.
[2]杨肇中.黄道周心性工夫论思想发微[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2014,17(03):60.
　YANG Zhao-zhong.Huang Daozhou’s Theory of Mental Noumenon[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(03):60.
[3]陈良武.试论黄道周博学多通学术品格的形成[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2014,17(03):52.
　CHEN Liang-wu.On the Formation of Huang Daozhou’s Academic Character[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(03):52.
[4]蔡杰,翟奎凤.黄道周对孟子性善论的坚守与诠释[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2017,20(02):16.
　CAI Jie,ZHAI Kui-feng.On Huang Daozhou’s Persistence and Annotation on Mencius’ Theory of Human Nature[J].philosophy&social sciences,2017,20(03):16.
[5]钟治国.朱子学与阳明学之关系考论——以钟芳与王阳明的思想交涉为例[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2017,20(03):2.
　ZHONG Zhi-guo.Relationship Between Zhu Xi and Wang Yangming＇s Theory——Taking the View Exchanges Between Zhong Fang and Wang Yangming as an Example[J].philosophy&social sciences,2017,20(03):2.
[6]蔡杰,翟奎凤.《月令明义》对《月令》的儒学化诠释[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2018,21(02):9.
　CAI Jie,ZHAI Kui-feng.Confucian Interpretation of Yue Ling by Expounding the Keynote of Yue Ling[J].philosophy&social sciences,2018,21(03):9.
[7]苏小秋.黄道周《春秋》学初探——以《表记集传》《坊记集传》为中心[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2019,22(01):27.
　SU Xiao-qiu.A Preliminary Exploration on Huang Daozhou’s “Chunqiu”Study[J].philosophy&social sciences,2019,22(03):27.
[8]许卉.黄道周的《孝经》改本与外传析论[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2019,22(01):19.
　XU Hui.Analysis on Daozhou’s Revision and Exegesis of Filial Piety[J].philosophy&social sciences,2019,22(03):19.
[9]张哲民.从《徙泽记》考论黄道周三移其居始末[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2020,23(03):30.
　ZHANG Zhe-min.A Study of Huang Daozhou’s Three Moves of His Residence Based on His Xi ZeJi[J].philosophy&social sciences,2020,23(03):30.
[10]程水龙.论东亚对叶采《近思录集解》的推崇与质疑[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2020,23(03):15.
　CHENG Shui-long.East Asia’s Admiration for and Questioning of Ye Cai’s Jin Si Lu Ji Jie[J].philosophy&social sciences,2020,23(03):15.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2017-03-12