|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]陈良武.试论黄道周博学多通学术品格的形成[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2014,17(03):52-59.
　CHEN Liang-wu.On the Formation of Huang Daozhou’s Academic Character[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(03):52-59.
点击复制

试论黄道周博学多通学术品格的形成()
分享到：

《集美大学学报》（哲社版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
17
期数:
2014年03期
页码:
52-59
栏目:
出版日期:
2014-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
On the Formation of Huang Daozhou’s Academic Character
作者:
陈良武
（闽南师范大学文学院，福建 漳州 363000）
Author(s):
CHEN Liang-wu
(College of Chinese Language and Literature，Minnan Normal University，Zhangzhou 363000，China)
关键词:
黄道周; 博学多通; 学术传统; 转益多师
Keywords:
Huang Daozhou; knowledgeable; academic tradition; learn from others
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
从有明一代学者的学术实际看，明代本有博雅之传统，故单纯以空疏不学讥之，则非持平之论。地处海滨的闽南也深受这种博学传统影响，入明以来的漳州士人中，博识洽闻者亦不乏其人。黄道周学贯古今，学问淹通广博，其博学多通学术品格的形成，既与明代博雅的学术传统有关，亦是其转益多师、师友讲问的结果。
Abstract:
According to the academic practice of scholars in the Ming Dynasty, there was a tradition of erudition at that time. Therefore，if the learning of the Ming Dynasty is considered emptiness, it is an unfair judgment. Although Zhangzhou was located in the remote beach, there were many learned scholars there in the Ming Dynasty. One of them was Huang Daozhou, who was knowledgeable. The formation of his academic character was not only associated with the academic tradition of erudition in the Ming Dynasty, but also the result of his learning from others.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]曾进兴,施婧,吴洁.史迹遗玉的环境压力与现实突围——清代以来保护黄道周文化史迹的实践与思考[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2014,17(03):77.
　ZENG Jin-xing,SHI Jing,WU Jie.The Environmental Pressure for Historical Heritage and Its Practical Breakthrough ——Practice and Thinking on the Protection of Huang Daozhou Cultural Heritage from the Qing Dynasty[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(03):77.
[2]翟奎凤.黄道周与宋明理学及朱子学[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2014,17(03):71.
　ZHAI Kui-feng.Huang Daozhou and Song Ming Neo-Confucianism and Zhuism[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(03):71.
[3]杨肇中.黄道周心性工夫论思想发微[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2014,17(03):60.
　YANG Zhao-zhong.Huang Daozhou’s Theory of Mental Noumenon[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(03):60.
[4]蔡杰,翟奎凤.黄道周对孟子性善论的坚守与诠释[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2017,20(02):16.
　CAI Jie,ZHAI Kui-feng.On Huang Daozhou’s Persistence and Annotation on Mencius’ Theory of Human Nature[J].philosophy&social sciences,2017,20(03):16.
[5]蔡杰,翟奎凤.《月令明义》对《月令》的儒学化诠释[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2018,21(02):9.
　CAI Jie,ZHAI Kui-feng.Confucian Interpretation of Yue Ling by Expounding the Keynote of Yue Ling[J].philosophy&social sciences,2018,21(03):9.
[6]苏小秋.黄道周《春秋》学初探——以《表记集传》《坊记集传》为中心[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2019,22(01):27.
　SU Xiao-qiu.A Preliminary Exploration on Huang Daozhou’s “Chunqiu”Study[J].philosophy&social sciences,2019,22(03):27.
[7]许卉.黄道周的《孝经》改本与外传析论[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2019,22(01):19.
　XU Hui.Analysis on Daozhou’s Revision and Exegesis of Filial Piety[J].philosophy&social sciences,2019,22(03):19.
[8]张哲民.从《徙泽记》考论黄道周三移其居始末[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2020,23(03):30.
　ZHANG Zhe-min.A Study of Huang Daozhou’s Three Moves of His Residence Based on His Xi ZeJi[J].philosophy&social sciences,2020,23(03):30.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-03-12