|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]蔡杰,翟奎凤.黄道周对孟子性善论的坚守与诠释[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2017,20(02):16-22.
　CAI Jie,ZHAI Kui-feng.On Huang Daozhou’s Persistence and Annotation on Mencius’ Theory of Human Nature[J].philosophy&social sciences,2017,20(02):16-22.
点击复制

黄道周对孟子性善论的坚守与诠释()
分享到：

《集美大学学报》（哲社版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
20
期数:
2017年02期
页码:
16-22
栏目:
出版日期:
2017-04-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
On Huang Daozhou’s Persistence and Annotation on Mencius’ Theory of Human Nature
作者:
蔡杰; 翟奎凤
（山东大学儒学高等研究院，山东 济南 250100）
Author(s):
CAI Jie; ZHAI Kui-feng
(Advanced Institute for Confucian Studies，Shandong University，Jinan 250100，China)
关键词:
黄道周; 性善一元论; 坚守; 诠释
Keywords:
Huang Daozhou;  the theory of goodness and monism;  persistence;  annotation
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
孟子的性善论深刻影响着中华民族，历代诸儒或有批评，或有继承，更有发展。明末大儒黄道周以不同于同时代主流的独特思想，对汉宋诸儒的人性论进行一一批评，并在此基础上坚守和诠释孟子的性善论。黄道周严分人性和气质，运用太极阴阳学说探求人性论的形上依据，说明人性着不得一毫气质，强调了天命之性的至善性与永恒性。关于恶的来由，黄道周走了一条不同于宋儒的路径，向外确立了人性是由后天积习所损坏，从而完善了性善一元论。
Abstract:
Mencius’ theory of human nature profoundly affects the Chinese nation. Ancient Confucianisms criticized, inherited or developed it. In the late Ming Dynasty, Huang Daozhou criticized the theory of human nature of the Han and Song dynasties’ Confucianisms in different ways from the mainstream of the contemporary. And on this basis, he adhered to and interpreted Mencius’s theory of goodness. Huang Daozhou distinguished human nature and temperament. On the metaphysical basis of humanity theory by using Taiji’s theory of Yin and Yang, he showed that human nature could not be mixed with a trace of temperament and emphasized the perfection and eternity of nature. As for the cause of evil, Huang took a path different from that of Song Confucianism and outwardly established that human nature was damaged by acquired habits to improve the goodness of the monism.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]曾进兴,施婧,吴洁.史迹遗玉的环境压力与现实突围——清代以来保护黄道周文化史迹的实践与思考[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2014,17(03):77.
　ZENG Jin-xing,SHI Jing,WU Jie.The Environmental Pressure for Historical Heritage and Its Practical Breakthrough ——Practice and Thinking on the Protection of Huang Daozhou Cultural Heritage from the Qing Dynasty[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(02):77.
[2]翟奎凤.黄道周与宋明理学及朱子学[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2014,17(03):71.
　ZHAI Kui-feng.Huang Daozhou and Song Ming Neo-Confucianism and Zhuism[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(02):71.
[3]杨肇中.黄道周心性工夫论思想发微[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2014,17(03):60.
　YANG Zhao-zhong.Huang Daozhou’s Theory of Mental Noumenon[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(02):60.
[4]陈良武.试论黄道周博学多通学术品格的形成[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2014,17(03):52.
　CHEN Liang-wu.On the Formation of Huang Daozhou’s Academic Character[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(02):52.
[5]蔡杰,翟奎凤.《月令明义》对《月令》的儒学化诠释[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2018,21(02):9.
　CAI Jie,ZHAI Kui-feng.Confucian Interpretation of Yue Ling by Expounding the Keynote of Yue Ling[J].philosophy&social sciences,2018,21(02):9.
[6]苏小秋.黄道周《春秋》学初探——以《表记集传》《坊记集传》为中心[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2019,22(01):27.
　SU Xiao-qiu.A Preliminary Exploration on Huang Daozhou’s “Chunqiu”Study[J].philosophy&social sciences,2019,22(02):27.
[7]许卉.黄道周的《孝经》改本与外传析论[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2019,22(01):19.
　XU Hui.Analysis on Daozhou’s Revision and Exegesis of Filial Piety[J].philosophy&social sciences,2019,22(02):19.
[8]张哲民.从《徙泽记》考论黄道周三移其居始末[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2020,23(03):30.
　ZHANG Zhe-min.A Study of Huang Daozhou’s Three Moves of His Residence Based on His Xi ZeJi[J].philosophy&social sciences,2020,23(02):30.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-05-19