理学与明代福建省志编修-《集美大学学报》（哲社版）

文章信息/Info

Title:: Influence of Neo-Confucianism on Fujian Chronicles Compiling in the Ming Dynasty

Author(s):: WANG Qiang1; WANG Xi-mou2; (1. Marxism College, Ningde Normal University, Ningde 352100, China; 2. Marxism College, Xinjiang Normal University, Wulumuqi 830017, China)

Keywords:: the Ming Dynasty; Fujian chronicles; Neo-Confucianism; the style of history book

摘要:: 明代福建编修完成三部省志，其中成书于明代前期的黄仲昭《八闽通志》与晚明时代的何乔远《闽书》属于官修，而成书于明代中期的王应山《闽大记》则属于私修志书。福建作为朱子学大本营，其地方志书编修与理学联系紧密。《八闽通志》针对《宋史·道学传》存在着的问题，补充并完善了“道学传”的人物收录标准；《闽大记》面对明代中期，学界王学崛起与“三教合一”理念流行的局面，在体例上进行了调整，为朱子设立“世家”且“儒林传”仅收录理学人物，以此强调程朱之学的正统地位。《闽书》受晚明学界思潮嬗变的影响，其编纂已不再强调突出理学这一目的，有关理学的内容也需要服从于全书的体例安排。明代福建省志的编修情况充分体现了时代学术思潮以及地方学术文化传统对于地方史志编修的影响。

Abstract:: There are three Fujian chronicles completed during the Ming Dynasty: Ba Min Tong Zhi and Min Shu, both of which were officially compiled, and Min Da Ji, which was personally compiled. They show a close connection with Neo-Confucianism, since Fujian is the base camp of Neo-Confucianism. Ba Min Tong Zhi improves the selection criteria for the characters to be included in Neo-Confucianism biographies; Min Da Ji emphasizes the importance of Neo Confucianism in style; Min Shu no longer highlights Neo Confucianism. The differences between the three chronicles reflect the influences of academic trends and local academic cultural tradition on the compiling of a regional chronicle.