«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《集美大学学报》（哲社版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:

21

期数:

2018年02期

页码:

9-14

栏目:

出版日期:

2018-04-28

文章信息/Info

Title:

Confucian Interpretation of Yue Ling by Expounding the Keynote of Yue Ling

作者:

蔡杰; 翟奎凤

（山东大学儒学高等研究院，山东 济南 250100）

Author(s):

CAI Jie; ZHAI Kui-feng

(Advanced Institute for Confucian Studies，Shandong University，Jinan 250100，China)

关键词:

黄道周; 《月令明义》; 儒学化; 石斋学; 经学史价值

Keywords:

Huang Daozhou;  Expounding the Keynote of Yue Ling; Confucianism;  Shizhai ;  value of Confucian classics study

分类号:

-

DOI:

-

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

明末大儒黄道周的《月令明义》是《月令》诠释史上有代表性而且风格独特的一部著作，也是黄道周后期《礼记》五解之一。该书为《月令》经文正名，并且将《月令》彻底儒学化，扫除历代儒者对经典的质疑。《月令明义》以“明义”的方式阐发律令条文背后的义理思想，在石斋学研究上可与黄道周生平行迹相互参照印证；在经学史价值上则体现了时代的解经特点与回应“礼是郑学”的论调，展现出黄道周实事求是的为学精神与明末时期科学实测的风气。

Abstract:

Huang Daozhou’s Expounding the Keynote of Yue Ling in the late Ming Dynasty is a representative and unique writing in the Yue Ling interpretation history, and also one of the five solutions of Book of Rites in his late period. The book proofs the title of Yue Ling, makes Yue Ling completely Confucianism, and sweeps away the Confucians’ doubts of all ages. The Expounding the Keynote of Yue Ling expounds the righteous thoughts behind the provisions of the ruling in the way of Expounding the Keynote, which can be cross-referenced with the traces of Huang Daozhou in the study of Shizhai; the book reflects the characteristics of classics explaining in that time and serves as a response to the view that “Book of Rites is a study of Zheng Xuan”, which shows Huang Daozhou’s realistic spirit of learning and the atmosphere of the scientific measurement in the late Ming Dynasty.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]曾进兴,施婧,吴洁.史迹遗玉的环境压力与现实突围——清代以来保护黄道周文化史迹的实践与思考[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2014,17(03):77.
　ZENG Jin-xing,SHI Jing,WU Jie.The Environmental Pressure for Historical Heritage and Its Practical Breakthrough ——Practice and Thinking on the Protection of Huang Daozhou Cultural Heritage from the Qing Dynasty[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(02):77.
[2]翟奎凤.黄道周与宋明理学及朱子学[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2014,17(03):71.
　ZHAI Kui-feng.Huang Daozhou and Song Ming Neo-Confucianism and Zhuism[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(02):71.
[3]杨肇中.黄道周心性工夫论思想发微[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2014,17(03):60.
　YANG Zhao-zhong.Huang Daozhou’s Theory of Mental Noumenon[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(02):60.
[4]陈良武.试论黄道周博学多通学术品格的形成[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2014,17(03):52.
　CHEN Liang-wu.On the Formation of Huang Daozhou’s Academic Character[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(02):52.
[5]蔡杰,翟奎凤.黄道周对孟子性善论的坚守与诠释[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2017,20(02):16.
　CAI Jie,ZHAI Kui-feng.On Huang Daozhou’s Persistence and Annotation on Mencius’ Theory of Human Nature[J].philosophy&social sciences,2017,20(02):16.
[6]苏小秋.黄道周《春秋》学初探——以《表记集传》《坊记集传》为中心[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2019,22(01):27.
　SU Xiao-qiu.A Preliminary Exploration on Huang Daozhou’s “Chunqiu”Study[J].philosophy&social sciences,2019,22(02):27.
[7]许卉.黄道周的《孝经》改本与外传析论[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2019,22(01):19.
　XU Hui.Analysis on Daozhou’s Revision and Exegesis of Filial Piety[J].philosophy&social sciences,2019,22(02):19.
[8]张哲民.从《徙泽记》考论黄道周三移其居始末[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2020,23(03):30.
　ZHANG Zhe-min.A Study of Huang Daozhou’s Three Moves of His Residence Based on His Xi ZeJi[J].philosophy&social sciences,2020,23(02):30.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2018-05-24