|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]张耀.开放性：“新子学”理论构建进程中的基本取向[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2018,21(03):46-52.
　ZHANG Yao.Openness: A Basic Orientation for Xinzixue Theory Construction[J].philosophy&social sciences,2018,21(03):46-52.
点击复制

开放性：“新子学”理论构建进程中的基本取向(PDF)
分享到：

《集美大学学报》（哲社版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
21
期数:
2018年03期
页码:
46-52
栏目:
出版日期:
2018-07-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Openness: A Basic Orientation for Xinzixue Theory Construction
作者:
张耀
（华东师范大学 中文系，上海 200241）
Author(s):
ZHANG Yao
(College of Chinese Language and Literature, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China)
关键词:
新子学; 开放; 多元; 话题
Keywords:
Xinzixue; openness; pluralism; topic
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
学者参与“新子学”理论构建时秉承着开放的心态与视野，“开放性”可被视为“新子学”理论构建进程中的基本取向。这具体表现在以下三方面：研究者对于“新子学”的界定有着开放性，“新子学”话题的选择有着开放性，“新子学”对于研究者也有开放性。“开放性”同时可能导致探讨焦点的分散，“新子学”研究者通过一些主导话语和会议论坛来调节，避免了其负面效果。
Abstract:
Scholars participate in the construction of Xinzixue with an open mind and view, and thus “openness” should be taken as the basic orientation for Xinzixue theory construction, which could be reflected in the following three aspects. First, researchers define Xinzixue with an awareness of openness, thus the definitions of Xinzixue seem diverse and pluralistic from different perspectives. Second, open Xinzixue topics, including classic ones as well as topics about modern academics, contemporary culture politics and economy. Third, Xinzixue is open to all scholars, scholars in mainland China, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, South Korea and some other neighboring countries, and even scholars in European and American academic circle. The openness may cause scattered focuses, but this problem can be resolved by Xinzixue researchers through offering some dominant topics and seminars.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]孙广,周斌.从共同的问题意识探求子学的整体性——“新子学”刍议[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2016,19(03):21.
　SUN Guang,ZHOU Bin.The Integrity of Zixue through Its Common Problem Consciousness——A Study of Xinzixue[J].philosophy&social sciences,2016,19(03):21.
[2]郝雨.“新子学”与现代文化：融入与对接[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2016,19(03):17.
　HAO Yu.Integration and Connection between Xinzixue and Modern Culture[J].philosophy&social sciences,2016,19(03):17.
[3]张永祥.中西方视野下的“新子学”再思考[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2018,21(03):39.
　ZHANG Yong-xiang.A Rethinking of Xinzixue from Western and Eastern Perspective[J].philosophy&social sciences,2018,21(03):39.
[4]黄燕强.“新子学”的思考与展望[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2018,21(03):29.
　HUANG Yan-qiang.Reflection and Prospect of Xinzixue[J].philosophy&social sciences,2018,21(03):29.
[5]陈祥龙,陈祥凤.“新子学”教育中教材修编的问题研究[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2019,22(04):46.
　CHEN Xiang-long,CHEN Xiang-feng.Issues Related to the Revision of Textbooks in the Education of “Xinzixue”[J].philosophy&social sciences,2019,22(03):46.
[6]徐昌盛.先秦诸子“学”与“术”的嬗递、宗旨与功能——兼论“新子学”的实践品格[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2019,22(04):38.
　XU Chang-sheng.The Origin of the Practical Character of Xinzixue:The Transmutation, Purpose and Function of“Learning”and “Skill” of Pre-Qin Scholars[J].philosophy&social sciences,2019,22(03):38.
[7]王宁宁,方勇.“新子学”对中国哲学反思的再深化[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2019,22(04):33.
　WANG Ning-ning,FANG Yong.Further Deepening of Xinzixue’s Reflection on Chinese Philosophy[J].philosophy&social sciences,2019,22(03):33.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2018-09-13