|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]毛郭平.作为批评资源的后记——以贾平凹《山本》后记为中心的考察[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2019,22(04):89-94.
　MAO Guo-ping.Postscript as A Resource of Criticism—An Investigation Centered on The Postscript of Jia Pingwa’s Qinling Mountains[J].philosophy&social sciences,2019,22(04):89-94.
点击复制

作为批评资源的后记——以贾平凹《山本》后记为中心的考察(PDF)
分享到：

《集美大学学报》（哲社版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
22
期数:
2019年04期
页码:
89-94
栏目:
出版日期:
2019-10-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Postscript as A Resource of Criticism—An Investigation Centered on The Postscript of Jia Pingwa’s Qinling Mountains
作者:
毛郭平
（太原师范学院文学院，山西 晋中 030619）
Author(s):
MAO Guo-ping
(Department of Chinese Language & Literature,Taiyuan Normal University,Jinzhong 030619,China)
关键词:
贾平凹; 《山本》; 后记; 文学批评
Keywords:
Jia Pingwa; Qinling Mountains; postscript; literary criticism
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
贾平凹在后记中谈到了小说创作的缘起、创作方法、人物原型、人生哲学以及文学立场。而在对《山本》的诸多诠释中，《山本》的后记是重要的理论资源。认同者觉得后记是解读小说的圭臬，反对者认为后记与小说形成了抵牾。文学批评不应只是简单地将小说与后记看作是互文关系，也不能把小说与后记割裂开来，应该找出两者之间的复杂多样关系，为此，方能真正地读懂小说，读懂作者的一番用心。
Abstract:
In his postscript,Jia Pingwa talks about the origin of novel creation,the method of creation,the prototype of characters,the philosophy of life and the literary stand.Among the many interpretations of Qinling Mountains,the postscript of Qinling Mountains is an important theoretical resource.Some people think that "postscript" is the criterion to interpret the novel,while opponents think that the postscript contradicts the novel.Literary criticism should not simply regard fiction and epilogue as intertextual relations,nor separate fiction from epilogue.It should find out the complex and diverse relations between them,so as to truly understand fiction and the author’s intention.

参考文献/References:

-

相似文献/References:

[1]关峰.论《老生》的生命书写[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2016,19(02):33.
　GUAN Feng.On Life Writing of The Old Life[J].philosophy&social sciences,2016,19(04):33.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
-
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-11-18