|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]王宁宁,方勇.“新子学”对中国哲学反思的再深化[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2019,22(04):33-37.
　WANG Ning-ning,FANG Yong.Further Deepening of Xinzixue’s Reflection on Chinese Philosophy[J].philosophy&social sciences,2019,22(04):33-37.
点击复制

“新子学”对中国哲学反思的再深化(PDF)
分享到：

《集美大学学报》（哲社版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
22
期数:
2019年04期
页码:
33-37
栏目:
出版日期:
2019-10-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Further Deepening of Xinzixue’s Reflection on Chinese Philosophy
作者:
王宁宁; 方勇
（华东师范大学中文系， 上海 200241）
Author(s):
WANG Ning-ning; FANG Yong
(College of Chinese Language and Literature，East China Normal University，Shanghai 200241，China)
关键词:
新子学; 中国性; 诸子学; 知识论
Keywords:
Xinzixue; Chinese characteristic; the pre-Qin scholars; epistemology
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
自古以来，中国哲学关注“实践”，从而形成了注重伦理诉求的“仁爱”社会。西方哲学注重“理智”，因而产生注重技术发展的“科技”社会。五四运动时期，西方文化被大量舶来。在这一过程中，如果不加反思任意套用西方模板，极容易促成“炊沙成饭”的局面。所以，“新子学”主张在当今中国文化发展中，我们既不能沉溺于“以中国解释中国”，也不能迷失在西学丛林中，而是要“坦然面对西方文化、正确处理中西文化差别、构建富有生命力的‘新子学’体系”。正如当代知识论的发展,已经不局限于对理论知识的研究，对实践知识的探索以及二者的结合，是知识论研究的新方向。这其中，当代知识论对“实践”和“理智”的融合，恰恰充分证明和实践了“新子学”这一主张。
Abstract:
Since ancient times,Chinese philosophy has focused on “phronesis”,thus forming a “benevolent” society that pays attention to ethical appeals.Western philosophy pays attention to “episeteme”,and thus produces a “science and technology” society that pays attention to the development of technology.During the May 4th movement,western culture was imported in large quantities.In this process,if we do not reflect on the use of western templates,it is very easy to promote the situation of “cooking sand as rice”.Therefore,“Xinzixue” advocates that in the development of Chinese culture today,we should neither indulge in “Explaining China in Chinese terms”,nor get lost in the jungle of western learning.Instead,we should face up to western culture calmly,properly handle the differences between Chinese and western cultures,and to construct a vigorous system of “Xinzixue”.Just as the development of contemporaryepistemology is no longer limited to the study of theoretical knowledge,the exploration of practical knowledge and the combination of the two are the new directions of epistemology.Among them,the fusion of “phronesis” and “episeteme” in contemporary knowledge theory fully proves and practices the proposition of “Xinzixue”.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]孙广,周斌.从共同的问题意识探求子学的整体性——“新子学”刍议[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2016,19(03):21.
　SUN Guang,ZHOU Bin.The Integrity of Zixue through Its Common Problem Consciousness——A Study of Xinzixue[J].philosophy&social sciences,2016,19(04):21.
[2]郝雨.“新子学”与现代文化：融入与对接[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2016,19(03):17.
　HAO Yu.Integration and Connection between Xinzixue and Modern Culture[J].philosophy&social sciences,2016,19(04):17.
[3]张耀.开放性：“新子学”理论构建进程中的基本取向[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2018,21(03):46.
　ZHANG Yao.Openness: A Basic Orientation for Xinzixue Theory Construction[J].philosophy&social sciences,2018,21(04):46.
[4]张永祥.中西方视野下的“新子学”再思考[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2018,21(03):39.
　ZHANG Yong-xiang.A Rethinking of Xinzixue from Western and Eastern Perspective[J].philosophy&social sciences,2018,21(04):39.
[5]黄燕强.“新子学”的思考与展望[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2018,21(03):29.
　HUANG Yan-qiang.Reflection and Prospect of Xinzixue[J].philosophy&social sciences,2018,21(04):29.
[6]陈祥龙,陈祥凤.“新子学”教育中教材修编的问题研究[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2019,22(04):46.
　CHEN Xiang-long,CHEN Xiang-feng.Issues Related to the Revision of Textbooks in the Education of “Xinzixue”[J].philosophy&social sciences,2019,22(04):46.
[7]徐昌盛.先秦诸子“学”与“术”的嬗递、宗旨与功能——兼论“新子学”的实践品格[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2019,22(04):38.
　XU Chang-sheng.The Origin of the Practical Character of Xinzixue:The Transmutation, Purpose and Function of“Learning”and “Skill” of Pre-Qin Scholars[J].philosophy&social sciences,2019,22(04):38.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-11-18