宋代理学家与《老子》的关系及其历史意义-《集美大学学报》（哲社版）

文章信息/Info

Title:: Relationship between Song Dynasty Neo-Confucianist Scholars and Lao Tzu and Its Historical Significance

Author(s):: XU Xiaoqing; (School of Marxism,Jimei University,Xiamen 361021，China)

Keywords:: Neo-Confucianists in the Song Dynasty; Lao Tzu; explicit denouncement and implicit agreement; integrating knowledge of Confucianism and Lao Tzu’s thoughts

摘要:: 宋明时期注《老》群体愈发庞大，但宋代少见为《老》作注的理学家，在对老子思想“明斥暗合”的主基调中，惟见吕祖谦和林希逸两人注《老》。面对佛道两家思想，宋代理学家对道家老子的态度，整体呈现出一个演进的过程：从接纳《老子》，到在批判中予以吸收或严厉批判，再到汇通儒老而注《老》。吕祖谦、林希逸《老子》注本的问世，标志着南宋时期理学界内已经出现“为《老》正名”的先声。

Abstract:: In the Song and Ming Dynasties,the group of people who annotated Lao Tzu increasingly expanded,but few Neo-Confucianists annotated Lao Tzu in the Song Dynasty.And in the tone of “explicit denouncement and implicit agreement” for Lao Tzu’s thoughts,only the annotations of Lao Tzu by Lu Zuqian and Lin Xiyi can be found.In both Buddhism and Taoism,the attitudes of Song Dynasty Neo-Confucianist scholars toward Taoism and Lao Tzu evolved over time: from accepting Lao Tzu,to absorbing it amid criticism or severely criticizing,and finally to commenting on it by integrating knowledge of Confucianism and Lao Tzu’s thoughts.The publication of Lu Zuqian and Lin Xiyi’s commentary on Lao Tzu marked the first words on “restoring the name of Lao Tzu” among Southern Song Neo-Confucianists.

[1]李辉.《老子》中的隐喻思维——以“水”“谷”之喻为例[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2015,18(01):131.
　LI Hui.The Metaphor Thinking in Tao Te Ching Illustrated by the Case of Water and Valley[J].philosophy&social sciences,2015,18(04):131.