|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]姚志文.“克己复礼为仁”：孔子的道德传播思想考察[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2024,27(01):16-23.
　YAO Zhiwen.“Restrain Oneself to Rite as Benevolence”:An Investigation of Confucius’ Moral Communication Thought[J].philosophy&social sciences,2024,27(01):16-23.
点击复制

“克己复礼为仁”：孔子的道德传播思想考察(PDF)
分享到：

《集美大学学报》（哲社版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
27
期数:
2024年01
页码:
16-23
栏目:
出版日期:
2024-02-26

文章信息/Info

Title:
“Restrain Oneself to Rite as Benevolence”:An Investigation of Confucius’ Moral Communication Thought
作者:
姚志文
华南师范大学城市文化学院，广东 佛山 528225
Author(s):
YAO Zhiwen
College of Urban Culture, South China Normal University, Foshan 528225, China
关键词:
孔子; 仁; 礼; 和; 道德传播
Keywords:
Confucius;  Benevolence;  Rite;  Harmony;  moral communication
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
孔子提出“克己复礼为仁”的道德传播命题，主张在人与人交往的过程中，将内在于人的“仁”激发为切实可感的道德共情，使人自觉认同和服从作为道德规范的“礼”。孔子认为，作为人的自然生命与伦理生命承载物的身体是沟通“仁”与“礼”的媒介，身体一直以“隐身”的方式参与着接受主体的人格塑造，它的媒介功能不仅是工具性的，也是存在性的。通过“礼”的仪式化传播，可以将身体的姿势、行为象征化为“仁”的意义表达，从而激活接受主体内心的道德意识，形成对道德规范的自觉。名分是沟通“礼”与“仁”的符号中介，通过“正名”重建名分与“仁”的指谓关系，使“礼”能有效约束个体行为，这是重建礼乐制度和政治、社会秩序的重要问题。
Abstract:
Confucius put forward the moral communication proposition of “Restrain oneself to Rite as Benevolence”, and advocated that in the process of interpersonal communication, the inner “Benevolence” should be stimulated into practical and tangible moral empathy, so that people can have self-identification and conscious obedience to the moral norms of “Rite”. Confucius believed that the body, as the carrier of human natural life and ethical life, is the medium of communicating “Benevolence” and “Rite”. The body has always been involved in the personality shaping of the receiving subject in the way of “stealth”, and its media function is not only instrumental, but also existential. Through the ritualized communication of “Rite”, the posture and behavior of the body can be symbolized into the meaning of “Benevolence”, so as to activate the moral consciousness of the accepting subject and form the consciousness of moral norms. Nomenclature is the symbol intermediary of communicating “Rite” and “Benevolence”. Through “Correct Name” to reconstruct the relationship between Nomenclature and “Benevolence”, so that “Rite” can effectively restrain individual behavior. This is the primary problem of reconstructing the Rite system and political and social order.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]吴新成.《中庸》第二十章与船山之工夫论[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2016,19(02):9.
　WU Xin-cheng.Chapter Twenty of The Doctrine of the Mean and Chuanshan’s Theory[J].philosophy&social sciences,2016,19(01):9.
[2]桑东辉.子产与孔子在思想上的契合与冲突[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2017,20(03):124.
　SANG Dong-hui.Similarities and Conflicts between Zichan and Confucius＇Thoughts[J].philosophy&social sciences,2017,20(01):124.
[3]陈巧玲,谢清果.孔老论人际沟通中的“怨”[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2020,23(01):28.
　CHEN Qiao-ling,XIE Qing-guo.The Views of Confucius and Lao Tzu on “Complaint”in Interpersonal Communication[J].philosophy&social sciences,2020,23(01):28.
[4]郭院林,李莉.另辟蹊径，以哲释孔：安乐哲的孔子研究[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2023,26(04):15.
　GUO Yuanlin,LI Li.A Different Way to Interpret Confucius through Philosophy：Analysis of Confucius Studies by Roger T.Ames[J].philosophy&social sciences,2023,26(01):15.
[5]吴小锋.老子与孔子言下的仁义问题[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2014,17(04):13.
　WU Xiao-feng.Lao Zi and Confucius’ Discussion of Benevolence and Righteousness[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(01):13.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-04-15