|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]但昭明.贫困救助的伦理基础批判及其可能出路[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2015,18(02):40-45.
　DAN Zhao-ming.A Criticism to the Ethical Foundation of Poverty Relief and Its Possible Solution[J].philosophy&social sciences,2015,18(02):40-45.
点击复制

贫困救助的伦理基础批判及其可能出路()
分享到：

《集美大学学报》（哲社版）[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
18
期数:
2015年02期
页码:
40-45
栏目:
出版日期:
2015-04-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
A Criticism to the Ethical Foundation of Poverty Relief and Its Possible Solution
作者:
但昭明
（华中农业大学政治与文化研究中心，湖北 武汉 430070）
Author(s):
DAN Zhao-ming
(Research Center of Politics and Culture, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China)
关键词:
贫困救助; 同情; 公平; 社会有机体
Keywords:
poverty relief;  sympathy;  justice;  social organism
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
在社会契约论的框架下，贫困救助的合理性面临难以克服的困难：在个体层面，内在的“同情”倾向无法突破原子式的壁垒；在公共层面，规范性的“公平”原则难以回应现实的拷问，在实践中甚至会滋生出新的不公平。问题的解决需要我们走出主体形而上学及其所主导的政治框架，并藉此寻求一种社会有机体的建构。
Abstract:
Under the framework of social contract theory, the justification of poverty relief will face some irresolvable difficulties. At the individual level, the inherent inclination of sympathy cannot avoid the limitation of atomism. At the public level, the normative principle of justice cannot respond to some challenges from reality, and especially, it will cause different kinds of injustices. How to solve this problem? We should abandon subjective metaphysics and its political framework and try to construct a social organism.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]陈江进.贫困救助中的人道与正义——以辛格方案为中心的考察[J].集美大学学报(哲社版),2015,18(02):25.
　CHEN Jiang-jin.Humanity and Justice in Poverty Relief: A Critical Study of Singer’s Project[J].philosophy&social sciences,2015,18(02):25.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2015-12-31