|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]邓雷.金圣叹评《水浒传》底本探析及再思考[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2016,19(02):45-49.
 DENG Lei.An Analysis and Rethinking of Jin Shengtan’s Master Copy of Outlaws of the Marsh[J].philosophy&social sciences,2016,19(02):45-49.
点击复制

金圣叹评《水浒传》底本探析及再思考()
分享到:

《集美大学学报》(哲学社会科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
19
期数:
2016年02期
页码:
45-49
栏目:
出版日期:
2016-04-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
An Analysis and Rethinking of Jin Shengtan’s Master Copy of Outlaws of the Marsh
作者:
邓雷
(福建师范大学文学院,福建 福州 350007)
Author(s):
DENG Lei
(College of Chinese Language and Literature, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350007, China)
关键词:
《水浒传》金圣叹评本底本
Keywords:
Outlaws of the MarshJin Shengtanmaster copy
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
金圣叹评《水浒传》的底本,学界或认为有七十回“古本”,或认为删节自百二十回本,或认为删节自大涤余人序本。然而这三种观点或因证据不足,或因对《水浒传》版本之间的关系理解不甚清晰,均存在一定的问题。通过对金本与百二十回本、大涤余人序本以及其他本子进行比勘发现,金圣叹评《水浒传》的底本为百二十回本系统的本子,同时参校了大涤余人序本系统以及容与堂本系统的本子。
Abstract:
There are different opinions about the master copy of Jin Shengtan's Outlaws of the Marsh. Some scholars believe that there was an ancient copy which contained seventy chapters, some think that it was abridged from a version of one hundred and twenty chapters, and some others insist that it was abridged from Dadi Yuren Xuben. Those opinions are not convincing enough, due to the lack of evidences or the failure to understand the relation between different versions of Outlaws of the Marsh. By comparing those different versions, a conclusion is drawn that Jin Shengtan's master copy was the one-hundred-and-twenty- chapter version, but it also used Dadi Yuren Xuben and Rong Yutang version as reference.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-05-20