|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]许卉.黄道周的《孝经》改本与外传析论[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,22(01):19-29.
 XU Hui.Analysis on Daozhou’s Revision and Exegesis of Filial Piety[J].philosophy&social sciences,2019,22(01):19-29.
点击复制

黄道周的《孝经》改本与外传析论(PDF)
分享到:

《集美大学学报》(哲学社会科学版)[ISSN:1006-6977/CN:61-1281/TN]

卷:
22
期数:
2019年01期
页码:
19-29
栏目:
出版日期:
2019-01-28

文章信息/Info

Title:
Analysis on Daozhou’s Revision and Exegesis of Filial Piety
作者:
许卉
(河北省社会科学院哲学所,河北 石家庄 050051)
Author(s):
XU Hui
(Hebei Academy of Social Sciences, Shijiazhuang 050051, China)
关键词:
黄道周《孝经》《孝经》改本《孝经》外传
Keywords:
Huang Daozhou Filial Piety revision of Filial Piety exegesis of Filial Piety
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
受晚明《孝经》学思潮及宋明《孝经》学发展内在逻辑的影响,黄道周推崇《孝经》,力图改变《孝经》沦为蒙学的境遇,恢复《孝经》的经典地位。与朱熹及晚明诸多改编《孝经》的儒者不同,黄道周推重流传的《今文孝经》,主张恢复《孝经》原貌,他所作《孝经》改本,对《孝经》文本的改订不大,只就个别字、句进行增删,对其基本内容和结构并没做大的删削和调整,基本上保留了所谓“旧本”原貌。黄道周的《孝经集传》是外传体的代表作,此书以《孝经》文本为基础,采撷他书与孝有关的文献资料,附丽于相应的经文之下,以经统传,以传辅经,深入系统地阐发《孝经》义理。黄道周的《孝经》改本和《孝经》外传等《孝经》学著作推动了晚明《孝经》学的复兴,在《孝经》学史上占有重要地位。
Abstract:
Influenced by the thought of Filial Piety in the late Ming dynasty and the development of the inner logic of Filial Piety in song and Ming dynasties, Daozhou praised Filial Piety in an attempt to change the situation of Filial Piety and rebuilt its classic status. Unlike Zhu Xi and other Confucian scholars, Daozhou advocated the Jing wen Filial Piety, and insisted to keep its original appearance. His revision basically kept the original appearance of Filial Piety and only a few words and sentences were added or deleted. Daozhou’s exegesis of Filial Piety is representative and extraordinary. His exegesis is based on the text of the Filial Piety and collects related documents to annotate and elucidate the meaning of the Filial Piety. Daozhou’s Filial Piety books promoted the revival of Filial Piety in the late Ming Dynasty and occupied an important position in the history of Filial Piety.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]曾进兴,施婧,吴洁.史迹遗玉的环境压力与现实突围——清代以来保护黄道周文化史迹的实践与思考[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,17(03):77.
 ZENG Jin-xing,SHI Jing,WU Jie.The Environmental Pressure for Historical Heritage and Its Practical Breakthrough ——Practice and Thinking on the Protection of Huang Daozhou Cultural Heritage from the Qing Dynasty[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(01):77.
[2]翟奎凤.黄道周与宋明理学及朱子学[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,17(03):71.
 ZHAI Kui-feng.Huang Daozhou and Song Ming Neo-Confucianism and Zhuism[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(01):71.
[3]杨肇中.黄道周心性工夫论思想发微[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,17(03):60.
 YANG Zhao-zhong.Huang Daozhou’s Theory of Mental Noumenon[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(01):60.
[4]陈良武.试论黄道周博学多通学术品格的形成[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2014,17(03):52.
 CHEN Liang-wu.On the Formation of Huang Daozhou’s Academic Character[J].philosophy&social sciences,2014,17(01):52.
[5]蔡杰,翟奎凤.黄道周对孟子性善论的坚守与诠释[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017,20(02):16.
 CAI Jie,ZHAI Kui-feng.On Huang Daozhou’s Persistence and Annotation on Mencius’ Theory of Human Nature[J].philosophy&social sciences,2017,20(01):16.
[6]蔡杰,翟奎凤.《月令明义》对《月令》的儒学化诠释[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,21(02):9.
 CAI Jie,ZHAI Kui-feng.Confucian Interpretation of Yue Ling by Expounding the Keynote of Yue Ling[J].philosophy&social sciences,2018,21(01):9.
[7]苏小秋.黄道周《春秋》学初探——以《表记集传》《坊记集传》为中心[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2019,22(01):27.
 SU Xiao-qiu.A Preliminary Exploration on Huang Daozhou’s “Chunqiu”Study[J].philosophy&social sciences,2019,22(01):27.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2019-03-10