[1]苏涵,周畅.初中语文教材插图的美术学批评[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2013,14(04):90-93.
SU Han,ZHOU Chang.Criticism on the Illustrations in Chinese Language Textbook of Junior High Schools[J].Journal of Jimei University(Education Science Edition),2013,14(04):90-93.
点击复制
《集美大学学报(教育科学版)》[ISSN:1671-6493/CN:35-1238/U]
- 卷:
-
第14卷
- 期数:
-
2013年04期
- 页码:
-
90-93
- 栏目:
-
学科教学研究
- 出版日期:
-
2013-12-31
文章信息/Info
- Title:
-
Criticism on the Illustrations in Chinese Language Textbook of Junior High Schools
- 文章编号:
-
1671-6493(2013)04-0090-04
- 作者:
-
苏涵1; 周畅2
-
1集美大学文学院,福建厦门361021;2厦门市滨水学校,福建厦门361000
- Author(s):
-
SU Han; ZHOU Chang
-
College of Chinese Literature and Language, Jimei University, Xiamen 361021, China
-
- 关键词:
-
美术教育; 初中语文; 教材插图; 美术学批评
- Keywords:
-
education of fine arts; Chinese language for junior high school; criticism on the illustrations
- 分类号:
-
G 424
- DOI:
-
-
- 文献标志码:
-
A
- 摘要:
-
在中小学语文教材中配以大量插图,不仅可以用文图互补的形式增加美感,激发想象,启悟思想,而且,也是一种重要的美术教育方式。但现行人教版初中语文的相当一部分插图,在构思上缺乏对于原文精髓的把握,图文关系很难相互呼应,很难引发读者更为丰富的想象与思考。还有不少插图,在位置经营上频出纰漏。虽然在现代绘画理念的影响下,画家们在位置经营时可以追求表达的主观性,但是,课文的插图与一般的自主创作尚有区别,那就是,要在真正领会原文核心意味与关键之处的基础上,再做匠心营构。而从插图的方法技能来讲,这些插图中,竟有不少作品既缺乏造型上的“准确感”,亦没能画出人物或景物的神韵来。这些应该引起高度的关注。
- Abstract:
-
There are numerous of illustrations in the textbooks of primary and middle school, which could, by mutual revelation of text and pictures, not only increase the sense of beauty, inspire imagination and enlighten thinking, but also could be a significant way for the education of fine art. However, in the current Chinese Textbook for junior high school published by Renmin Jiaoyu Publishing House, many illustrations lack understanding of the text, picture and text not in corresponding, and are therefore unable to stimulate the readers’ imagination and thinking. Moreover, many illustrations are not in their proper location. Although the painters may take the influence of modern art theory and pursue expression of their subjectivity, they cannot do it for textbook illustrations, for textbook illustrations are different from artistic creations, which must be done on the basis of a fully understanding of the text. In addition, a number of the illustrations do not seem to have the sense of “accuracy” and they fail to draw the charm of human figures or scenery.
参考文献/References:
-
相似文献/References:
[1]黄金丽,吴玉海,赵鑫.苏教版语文教材单元设计思路解析[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2014,15(04):96.
HUANG Jin-li,WU Yu-hai,ZHAO Xin.Theoretical Analysis of Language Teaching Material Training Unit Design Train of Thought[J].Journal of Jimei University(Education Science Edition),2014,15(04):96.
备注/Memo
- 备注/Memo:
-
[收稿日期]2013-09-15
[基金项目]
[作者简介]苏涵(1955— ),男,山西芮城人,集美大学文学院教授,主要从事中国古代文学与语文教育研究。
更新日期/Last Update:
2013-12-31