|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]马健云.高校教师考核评价的问题检视及改进策略[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2024,25(03):16-22.
　Ma Jian-yun.Review of the Problems and Improvement Strategies of University Faculty’s Assessment and Evaluation[J].Journal of Jimei University(Education Science Edition),2024,25(03):16-22.
点击复制

高校教师考核评价的问题检视及改进策略(PDF)
分享到：

《集美大学学报（教育科学版）》[ISSN:1671-6493/CN:35-1238/U]

卷:
第25卷
期数:
2024年03期
页码:
16-22
栏目:
教师发展研究
出版日期:
2024-07-31

文章信息/Info

Title:
Review of the Problems and Improvement Strategies of University Faculty’s Assessment and Evaluation
作者:
马健云
河南科技大学商学院，河南 洛阳471023
Author(s):
Ma Jian-yun
School of Business,Henan University of Science and Technology,Luoyang 471023，China
关键词:
教师评价; 师德; 教学; 科研; 社会服务
Keywords:
assessment and evaluation;  the teacher’s ethics;  teaching;  scientific research;  social services
分类号:
-
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
高校教师考核评价实践的展开以高校和学术共同体为共同依托，需要在正式组织的规范运作与非正式组织的情感融合中达成目标。科学合理的考核评价在应然层面需要遵守过程的契约规范，凝结主客体的交往互动，并坚守考评价值的伦理道德。但观照现实，考核评价环节仍面临师德量化考核模糊、教学与科研关系割裂、社会服务制度设计欠佳等问题。需形成师德考核制度约束与道德指引的双向合力，以“教学学术”提升教学和科研评价效能，明确社会服务考核的定位与导向，实现高校教师考核评价迈向理性发展之路。
Abstract:
The development of the evaluation practice of university faculty is based on the common support of the university and the academic community, which needs to achieve the goal in the normative operation of the formal organization and the emotional fusion of the informal organization. Scientific and reasonable evaluation should abide by the contract norms of the process, condense the interaction between subject and object, and adhere to the ethics of evaluation value. However, considering the reality, there are still some problems in the assessment and evaluation process, such as the double trouble of the theory and practice of quantitative evaluation of teachers’ ethics, the split between teaching and research, the poor design of social service system. It’s urgent to form a two-way joint force of the constraints of teacher ethics assessment system and moral guidance, improve the evaluation efficiency of teaching and scientific research with “teaching and academic” as the balance, and clarify the orientation and guidance of social service assessment, so as to realize the rational development of the evaluation of university faculty.

参考文献/References:

相似文献/References:

[1]王世立.从古人的“三不朽”看高校教师的师德培养[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2019,20(03):11.
　WANG Shi-li.On the Cultivation of Teachers’Morality in Colleges and Universities from the Perspective of “Three Immortality” of the Ancients[J].Journal of Jimei University(Education Science Edition),2019,20(03):11.
[2]林瑞芳,董丽云.基于多模态的自主学习模式与评价体系探讨[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2019,20(05):59.
　LIN Rui-fang,DONG Li-yun.Autonomous Learning Model and Assessment System in Multimode Context[J].Journal of Jimei University(Education Science Edition),2019,20(03):59.
[3]黄建辉,周路遥.构建服务于师生共同发展的评价体系——美国威斯康星州“教育者效能系统”教师评价实践及其启示[J].集美大学学报(教育科学版),2020,21(04):5.
　HUANG Jian-hui,ZHOU Lu-yao.Construction of Evaluation System for Teachers and Students Mutual Development:The Teacher Evaluation Practice of Wisconsin Educator Effectiveness System in America and Its Enlightenment[J].Journal of Jimei University(Education Science Edition),2020,21(03):5.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
更新日期/Last Update: 2024-07-31