论我国合同法中附随义务的内涵——以比较法考察为中心-《集美大学学报》（哲社版）

文章信息/Info

Title:: The Connotation of the Contractual Collateral Obligation: Centering on the Comparative Law

Author(s):: ZHAO Ming-fei; (Law School, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, China)

Keywords:: contractual collateral obligation; payment obligation; obligation of protection

摘要:: 我国《合同法》未对附随义务采取统一立法，理论界对于附随义务的内涵存有较大分歧。从源起上看，现代法律意义上的附随义务是通过缔约过失责任——积极侵害债权——附保护第三人效力契约三大理论依次建构起来的。从功能上看，附随义务理论之重要目的在于扩充合同法的保护范围，保障给付利益的实现以及保护债权人在发展的合同关系中的人身及财产利益。从内容上看，附随义务与给付义务共同构成合同义务体系,附随义务可发生于合同关系的各个阶段，其内容较为灵活，既包括与给付有关的附随义务，又包括保护债权人的人身及财产利益的保护义务。

Abstract:: The contract law of our country does not take uniform legislation on the contractual collateral obligation, so scholars have great divided opinions on the connotation of the contractual collateral obligation. In terms of the source, the contractual collateral obligation, in the sense of modern law, is constructed through the liability of culpai—the active infringement of the creditor’s rights—and the contract of protection of the third party. In terms of function, the important purpose of the contractual collateral obligation is to expand the scope of protection of contract law, guarantee the realization of payment of interest and protect the personal and property interests of creditors. In terms of content, the contractual collateral obligation and the payment obligation constitute the contractual obligation system, which can occur at all stages of the contractual relationship, including the contractual collateral obligations related to the payment and the protection obligations of the personal and property interests of the creditor.